“Affidavit of Illegal or Corrupted Data”;
 Issued by “Eduardo Osborn El Dey, a.k.a., U.S. Army NCO Clarence E. Young”.
Denver County District Court, 
Grand-Jury Case # 16CR001, and Individual Case #: 17CR10088;
Colorado Supreme Court Case #: 2018SA213;
United States District Court, Colorado District Case #:  17-cv-01680-RM-KLM;
 and, Supreme Court of Law, USA, Case # 2018-0001.
	
	For the public record, this affidavit hereby asserts sworn testimony with regard certain court related evidence, largely in the form of an external Passport hard drive, which was handed from Deputy State Attorney General Robert Shapiro, to Laurence Goodman, during proceedings before the Colorado District Court for Denver, on the 27th of August, 2018, as testified to by Charles Stewart who accompanied Lawrence Rene Goodman Plaintiff in fact and Defendant in Error.  

I, conclude after inspecting the usability of the hard drive, that all or most of the data on the hard drive it unintelligible to serves as evidence (discovery). Any data that may be intelligible on the hard drive has been stored in a foreign and private proprietary format, all of which makes all of that data unreasonably burdensome for myself, Goodman, or a hired computer professional to read, and this should never be the condition in a court of law and equity. Evidence must and should be easy to examine when possible, failure to achieve this standard, makes the rules on discovery a mockery, therefore obstructs Law and Equity. 

The states Michael Spear alleged [Judge Judicial Referee] has the burden of assuring due process. Due Process under the United States Juris Prudence system requires, and demands securing of the Rights of the People, see the United States Declaration of Independence, clause 2, the Lawful role of an Article 3, Judge. The People are not computer programmers, and should not be expected to be as some have various occupations, and professionals.  
	I find it unreasonable; we are further completely obstructed from any ability to search this hard drive for any specific phrases of words, or for specific names of any specific documents or other files. 
	The courts, alleged judicial officer has the responsibility of Due Process, Law and Equity as the Referee in this meritless nullity. Michael Spear as the [referee] must assure that discovery is Fair and Equitable, by ordering Robert Shapiro to return Mr. Goodman’s personal property of which the Fair and Adequate discovery should contain, the necessary evidence to exonerate Lawrence Rene Goodman and expose the true Defendants, who are usurping authority in an AT LAW JURISDICTION. It is reasonable for Shapiro to use the discovery he is purporting to   provide to Mr. Goodman and return Mr. Goodman’s Property to its Rightful owner and use for trial in what seems to be a Kangaroo court.
	
Mr. Goodman has assured me that his original files that were represented by Robert Shapiro as having been copied to this current Passport hard drive, were originally in easy to read formats that are commonly used by common American computer users.  
	Almost none of the many files on this Passport hard drive are in this sort of an “easy to read format that is commonly used by common American computer users”.  

	Mr. Goodman has placed before me his complaints against Robert Shapiro; and Goodman has asked me to exercise my inherent assessment, in the interests of Public Justice, to render my own judgement concerning whether or not Robert Shapiro is competent to know that he must provide full and accurate discovery. It seems Shapiro is intent on providing false discovery and false statements, with malicious intent to deceive any or all courts concerned about securing Justice in this case. Therefore, it is the duty of the referee to assure Robert Shapiro, is competent, and compliant with fair and adequate discovery.
	My examination of this hard drive indicates that any statement from Robert Shapiro which indicated that all tools necessary to view these files are on this Passport hard-drive, is, categorically, a false statement. 

	Further, Mr. Goodman should not be obstructed from preparing a full and effective rebuttal in this retaliation case. 

	“The problem is, for you to use the disk ‘as is’; you have to be a professional in the forensic field, for you to be able to even look at (those files). For a normal computer user, that is ‘locked out’, it is ‘how do I get to my data?’ As a professional in the field, I could probably take the image here, and make another copy, which could be ‘readable’, however this is unreasonable burdensome, and denies unencumbered access to discovery.  Mr. Goodman is rebutting false allegations not engaging in a computer science challenge.

	(I, am aware that Mr. Lawrence Rene Goodman and Charles Stewart are in the process of attempting to secure an affidavit from a computer professional, where-in his testimony on this issue would more directly be affirmed.)

	Further; in my review of the larger context of the activities of the parties in this case; I do find “probable cause to form the belief”, that, Robert Shapiro is acting in manners which tend to deceive all courts concerned about the holy cause of Justice in this case.  As I witnessed on August 4th, 2018h. Robert Shapiro exceeded his authority by telling to move back, because I have no license to practice Law. It is he and the states referee that must have a license, and those license are not on the record, therefore do not exist as they are not proven, in what has all the appearance of a Kangaroo court. This includes proof that both Shapiro and Spear have proper Fiduciary Oaths and Bonds.
	From my brief personal encounter with Robert Shapiro, and from my general review of the documents which he has submitted in this case; Robert Shapiro is alert, oriented and coherent, capable of comprehending whether or not his actions will serve to advance the Law, Advancing the Law cannot be achieved in reprisals.	

More specifically, Mr, Goodman has set his complaint before me, on this date of August 27th, ; [Judge] Spear, of the Denver County District Court, has a duty to due process and must not be misled by words of Robert Shapiro. In previous discussions and perhaps hearings; Judge Spear, and the court over which he presides, received apologies from Robert Shapiro; because Robert Shapiro and associates had failed to comply with those Discovery Rules C.R. CRIM. rule 16.  

	Under Penalty of Perjury, as administered by any coherent, competent 12-person jury (knowing Articles 1, 2, 3, and 6 of the United States Constitution), which reasonably and unanimously affirms harmony with true organic conscience-bound “due process of law”, I do solemnly swear that these words are “True”.

_________________________________________________________________
Eduardo Osborn El Dey, NCO U.S. Army
P.O. Box 441756, Aurora Province of Colorado
[80044].
720-422-8188
This record was acknowledge before me on this date of:  ____________________ , year of our Lord; 2018.

____________________________________________________________________
Witness 1: and/or Notary Public; State of Colorado, County of __________________.

_____________________________			________________________________
Witness 2; signature.						Witness 2: Printed.