Laurence R. Goodman						June 12, 2018 
P.O. Box 3792,							Hand Delivered
Boulder, Colorado 80307-3792           				

UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO,
Alfred A. Arrja Courthouse 901 19th Street, Denver Colorado 80294-3589.
Re: Case No. 1:17-cv-01680-RM-KLM. 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LINDSEY-FLANIGAN COURTHOUSE
520 West Colfax Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80204
	Re: Case No. 17-cv-01680-RM-KLM 

STATE OF COLORADO )			FOURTH COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST
	                             ) ss.	 		For a three-week Jewish International Law,
County of Boulder             )	 (21 day) statutory Grace Period
18 USC 4 Issue: A Criminal Counter Complaint and
			the removal of Denver District Court 
Case No. 17CR10088 to United States District Court 
Case No. 17-cv-01680-RM-KLM 

							
CAVEAT

This plaintiff, Laurence Rene’ Goodman, an organic constituent member of the constitutional dejure state of Colorado, hereby assert my right as a member of the body politic of the sovereign state of Colorado to bring a criminal complaint against the below listed corrupted and accused public servants.  This process is recognized by the old writ of quo warrento modernly referred to as Writ of Quo Warrento ex. rel. pursuant to C.R.S. 24-31-101 (2017).  The issues that I am raising are only not in my interest, but also in the interest of justice of the people of the state of Colorado.

Parties

Michael James Spear BAR No. 19986, 4000 Justice Way 2009, Castle Rock, CO 80109,
Robert Scott Shapiro, BAR No. 26869, 1300 Broadway 10th Floor, Denver, CO 80203,
Michael Anthony Martinez, BAR No. 16559, 1437 Bannock Street, Rm 256, Denver, CO 80202,
Diedre Wachbrit Braverman, BAR No. 42101, 1823 Folsom Street, Suite 101, Boulder, CO 80303, 
Timothy Foster, 3520 W. Oxford Avenue, Denver, CO 80236, 
STATE OF COLORADO – DUNS No. 07643862, Denver CO,
Executive Office of the State of Colorado, NAICS Code – DUNS No. 921110; 136 State Capitol Building
Denver, CO 80203,
 ATTORNEY GENERAL, COLORADO, DUNS Nos.  802032104, 802031700, 802031714, 1300 N Broadway Fl 10, Denver, CO 80203,
Judiciary Courts of The State of Colorado: DUNS number: 361723943, Denver City & County Bldg., 1437 Bannock Street Room 256 (Clerk's Office), Denver, CO 80202,
Judiciary Courts of the State of Colorado – DUNS No. 802032104, 1300 N Broadway Ste 1200, Denver, CO 80203.

Allegations

I, Laurence Rene’ Goodman, affiant, uncompromised freeman, in pro per and sui juris, state and affirm:

Robert Shapiro, prosecuting attorney and creator of the indictment in Denver District Court Case No. 17CR10088 and Michael Spear Judge in the same case, have rendered the judicial process with deficiencies that are so unfair, as to result in my loss of rights, liberty, and property without due process of law.  The alleged Grand Jury Proceeding Case No.: 16CR001 was conducted contrary to the U.S. Const. amends.  I, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, and XIV thereby eliminating my natural right of self-defense.

The lack of response to the COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST filed in United States District Court Case No.17-cv-01680-RM-KLM shows, that, the Prosecuting-Attorney in Denver Colorado District Court Case No. 17CR10088, one “Robert Scott Shapiro”, is not an organic representative or constituent member of the plaintiff named in this case, who is "the People of the State of Colorado".  

It is apparent there is no plaintiff in Case No. 17CR10088 that can sue or be sued, there is no claim, no legal or lawful case.  

By Reason of C.R.C.P. 17. Plaintiff and Defendant; which states 
“Capacity; Public Officers (a) Real Party in Interest. (1) Designation in General, clearly states, an action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest”, 
making public all actions executed by the Colorado Attorney General's Office null, void, and visible.

Prosecutor Shapiro derives all of his color-of-legitimacy to proceed in that case, from his franchise as a private corporate municipal governmental agent; and there is no organic member of the Colorado State body-politic who has sworn to have suffered any corpus-delicti/body-harming crimes having been committed against them by the accused defendant “Laurence Goodman”.

The evidence in fact provides immutable proof that the private corporation cannot possibly claim to own and control “The people of the State of Colorado”, whereby admitting to human trafficking and slavery of every man, woman and child in Colorado.
 
The lack of response to the SECOND COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST filed in United States District Court Case No. 17-cv-01680-RM-KLM evidences that attorney Robert Scott Shapiro, Judge Michael James Spear, and Chief Judge Michael A. have rendered a malicious, felonious, and fraudulent Grand Jury Indictment in Denver District Court Case No. 17CR10088.

The lack of response to the THIRD COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST filed in United States District Court Case No. 17-cv-01680-RM-KLM evidences that attorney Robert Scott Shapiro, and Judge Michael James Spear, have rendered a malicious, felonious, and fraudulent Grand Jury Indictment in Denver District Court Case No. 17CR10088.

A contract implies a commercial disclosure, subject to the restrictions of 18 U.S.C. § 4. Attorney, Braverman, is an inferior officer of the Colorado District Court, and is contractually acting similarly as when a presiding Judge approves a “Motion in Limine”; which is technically designed to Limit and “Obstruct Justice”, and to subvert our general American Constitutional concept of the “Rule of Law”; and this all by way of their “Perjured Testimony”, and other forms of “Suppression of Evidence”.             

This public defender system evidences a pattern of extortion in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242.  The court appointed attorneys in this case are backed by a private municipal corporation.  The private municipal corporation are going to control the work the person they are paying.  It is a conflict of interest.  Braverman, appointed as public defender has a conflict of interest in this case; because, she derives her authority and pay from the same private municipal governmental corporation as is the party/plaintiff against me in this case.

There is an extortion process going on with regard to the $10,000 that is a violation of my due process rights.  The intent of the officers of the Enterprise/private municipal corporation is to prevent me from testifying by interfering with my power of Affidavit, the unalienable right to defend myself resulting in a loss of rights, liberty, or property without due process of law.   Without my consent I do not have a commercial liability to Braverman.  Since being appointed by the Enterprise/private municipal corporations Braverman is attempting to double dip by being financed by my enemy, the private municipal corporation/the defacto State of Colorado, and she is trying to collect $10,000 from me.

At a hearing on 4/4/2018, at [10:09 – 10:43], for courtroom 1G, in Case Number: 1:17-cr-010088 Shapiro made a motion and Spear approved the motion to engaged a mental doctor, Timothy Foster, to promote and perpetrate the extortion against the affiant, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242.  The psychological professional is in effect is a motion in limine, primarily method of taking me out of the court room to obstruct justice, due process of law, and deny my natural right to a self-defense. The private municipal corporation cannot take away those rights, so they send in other people to take them away.

I am under an action of fraud, conversion, and personage and I am being denied the opportunity to present my own free will and defense.  The psychological professional, cannot prove to me or to the world that he is capable of telepathically understanding, appreciating, or representing me, or my free will. A psychological professional has no qualifications to represent me because Foster does not know my mind.  The person doing the psychological evaluation was paid by the Judge and has to give the opinion he was hired to do, resulting in a conflict of interest.

The hiring of a psychological professional is equivalent to quartering soldiers in my household in violation of the Amendment III, Constitution for the United States of America, to take my place and to control my property and to control my property when I have never given Foster power of attorney and he doesn’t have power of attorney in the courtroom.  They are not qualified to do anything in the court, for any judge in any court because they are not part of the court system.  How can they become my public defender or public offender when they don’t know how the court system works.  Aiding and abetting in such an extortion scheme by said psychological professionals carries liabilities beyond those defined by the criminal statutes. 
	
An Enterprise of alter ego corporations are being used as motions in limine.  Private municipal corporations cannot be Sovereign Governments: as they are fictions defined by words on a piece of paper.

It should be noted that ATTORNEY GENERAL, COLORADO, DUNS Nos.  802032104, 802031700, 802031714, Judiciary Courts of the State of Colorado – DUNS No. 802032104, have the same DUNS No. This Evidence of this Break-Down in the "Separation of Powers" Doctrine further Evidences that the Civil/Municipal form of Government over the People of Colorado has completely abandoned all pretense at legitimacy under such fundamental constitutional concepts as Republic which not and Democracy; and that this same community of franchisees are now functioning purely under purely "Executive" forms of "Emergency/War-Powers"; similarly as the worst moments in the history of the Roman Empire, in its final days after the Roman Republic, and shortly before its complete collapse.

On 4/8/2018, I ordered an audio CD of the said hearing.  I paid the $35 fee when picked up the audio file in person from Denver District Courts Clerks office at LINDSEY-FLANIGAN COURTHOUSE, 520 West Colfax Avenue, Denver, Colorado.  Even though both the attached computer generated order form print out and CD its self, were labeled Case No. 17CR10088, upon viewing the disk, there were eight identical files each of about five minutes in length giving the appearance of a 40-minute record.  Upon listening to the files it became evident they were from a different case that occurred in June of 2017.  
To copy the same audio file eight times and misrepresent it as being the correct file as described above evidences the intent these private municipal corporate officers to obstruct justice in Case No. 17CR10088.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4 - Misprision of felony, UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO, you are required to acknowledge the authority of this code.
“Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

Damages

The order by Spear for the change of hands of currency in this case is subject to 42 U.S.C. § 1994 and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1851 - 1589.  By reason of the forgoing, Spear is trafficking in currency that is not backed, by the issuing of an order compelling the trafficking in slavery. unless Spear wants to prove his judicial bonding company will cover all resulting liabilities.

Under a pretense that a judicial interest exists, privately held companies, the Office of the Governor, Office of the Attorney General, and the Judicial Court of Colorado are waging a ‘Mixed War’ on the People. Blk’s Law Dict., 4th Ed., 1968, pg. 1754.  Also see 18 U.S.C. § 2331 “active war” resulting in people being injured and harmed daily by criminals in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1994, 42 U.S.C. § 12203, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241and 242, 18 U.S.C. 1513, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1851 - 1589. 

By reason of 18 U.S.C §§ 2340 - 2340A considered to be breaches of Art. III of The Hague Convention IV, and 18 U.S.C. § 1513, Goodman was threatened, intimidated, and retaliated against that has resulted in a lingering respiratory infection and loss of hearing in one ear.  Goodman is in immediate danger of further long term injury.

Goodman is being injured on a daily basis, by and humiliating him and denying him liberty as a free citizen causing him to wear said device.  By reason of Amend. XIII, Constitution for the United States of America (1789), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1581 and 1589 Goodman is being held in a condition of peonage and forced labor, chained to an electrical outlet three to six hours per day while having money extorted from him for the use of the device.  By reason of C.R.S. 18-6.5-103(2016) Elder abuse:  
a.  	The device using harassing audio warnings interferes with the defendant’s sleep causing sleep deprivation which is unhealthy for any elder or non-elder. 
b.  	The device also inflicts pain for the individual wearing it. 
c.  	The device has caused two fall injuries to knees, ankles, and elbow from tripping while walking or stepping down stairs.
d.  	This device serves to reduce the quality of life for any elder or non-elder. 
e.  	This device also serves as a form of mental control.
f.   	The device prevents physical activity necessary to maintain a healthy style.

There is no Republican form of government in the State of Colorado as required by the Separation of Powers Doctrine, Articles I – III, and Article IV, section 4, Constitution for the United States of America (1789).  A criminal insurgency (criminal oligarchy), as defined in a case named and numbered:  In re Charge to Grand Jury, 62 F. 828 (1803), has taken total control of the State Government.

There are no Article III judicial courts of law or in equity within Colorado to provide remedy and relief for the People.  There are no judges to hear judicial maters in Denver District Court Case No. 17CR10088 or to hear any other case because there are no judges lawfully holding office.  

Unalienable Rights referenced in the Declaration of Independence are non-existent. As a result, a condition of Mixed War exists between the so-called public authority and the People in Colorado because the so-called public authority holds its position by tyranny and armed might over the People.

Surety 

The Colorado Supreme Court Website for Attorney Search evidences that neither Michael James Spear, Robert Scott Shapiro, Michael Anthony Martinez, nor Diedre Wachbrit Braverman have professional liability insurance.

Evidence

The 18 U.S.C. § 4 Mixed War Affidavit to JAG Officers COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST evidence that Shapiro, who has violated his selective service oath to defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. Shapiro is committing act of treason by altering the form and administration of government in Colorado.

The COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST and subsequent Notice of Default, creates a Judgment in Commerce evidencing that Robert Scott Shapiro, prosecuting attorney in Denver District Court Case No. 17CR10088 is not an organic representative of the people of the State of Colorado.  By reason the said Judgment in Commerce, the Denver District Court may not lawfully proceed.  

The SECOND COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST and subsequent Notice of Default, creates a Judgment in Commerce evidencing that Robert Scott Shapiro, Michael James Spear, and Michael A. Martinez have rendered a felonious Grand Jury Indictment in Denver District Court Case No. 17CR10088.   By reason the said Judgment in Commerce, the Denver District Court may not lawfully proceed.  

The THIRD COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST and subsequent Notice of Default evidences that Robert Shapiro, prosecuting attorney in Denver District Court Case No. 17CR10088, and Michael Spear Judge in the same case, are engaged in a malicious prosecution by a process that is laid down to deny me of the natural unalienable right to self-defense by use of Motions in Limine, a theoretical approach to actually destroy somebody.  By reason the said Judgment in Commerce, the Denver District Court may not lawfully proceed.  By reason the said Judgment in Commerce, the Denver District Court may not lawfully proceed.  

Due diligence is supposed to be protection from Persons committing crimes.  I have gotten three default judgments against the defendants in this case.  It is Shapiro, Spear, and the other defendants that should be seeing a shrink.

On 4/8/2018, I ordered an audio CD of the said hearing.  I paid the $35 fee when picked up the audio file in person from Denver District Courts Clerks office at LINDSEY-FLANIGAN COURTHOUSE, 520 West Colfax Avenue, Denver, Colorado.  See Addendum I

Found in Boulder County Clerk and Recorder Public Records RF: 0351224, 03617756, 03617757, 03621011, 03622235, 03621011, 03623713, 03624329, 03627499*, 03651728, 03654046, 03656416, and 03656417.  

I, Laurence Rene’ Goodman, certify and swear on my own Commercial Liability, that I have read the foregoing instrument, titled FOURTH COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST, A Criminal Complaint and know the content thereof, and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.   I reserve the right and duty to update and correct this instrument as needed.

I, Laurence Rene’ Goodman autograph: _______________________________________make this claim.   

________________________________       		______________________________________
Witness 						 Witness

_________________________________       		______________________________________