Laurence R. Goodman						May 29, 2018 
P.O. Box 3792,							Hand Delivered
Boulder, Colorado 80307-3792           				

UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO,
Alfred A. Arrja Courthouse 901 19th Street, Denver Colorado 80294-3589.
Re: Case No. 1:17-cv-01680-RM-KLM. 

STATE OF COLORADO )			FOURTH COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST
	                             ) ss.	 		For a three-week Jewish International Law,
County of Boulder             )	 (21 day) statutory Grace Period
18 USC 4 Issue: A Criminal Complaint and
			the removal of Denver District Court 
Case No. 17CR10088 to United States District Court 
Case No. 17-cv-01680-RM-KLM 
						
I, Laurence Rene’ Goodman, affiant, uncompromised freeman, in pro per and sui juris, state and affirm:

Parties

Michael James Spear BAR No. 19986, 4000 Justice Way 2009, Castle Rock, CO 80109;
Robert Scott Shapiro, Bar No. 26869, 1300 Broadway 10th Floor, Denver, CO 80203; 
Diedre Wachbrit Braverman, BAR No. 42101, 1823 Folsom Street, Suite 101, Boulder, CO 80303; 
Timothy Foster, 3520 W. Oxford Avenue, Denver, CO 80236; 
State of Colorado – DUNS No. 815057126; ------------
Executive Office of the State of Colorado, NAICS Code – DUNS No. 921110; ---------------------
ATTORNEY GENERAL, COLORADO, DUNS Nos.  802032104, 802031700, 802031714, 1300 N BROADWAY FL 10, DENVER, CO 80203
Judiciary Courts of the State of Colorado – DUNS No. 802032104, 1300 N BROADWAY STE 1200, DENVER, CO 80203
Allegations

Denver District Court Judge ---------------------

Shapiro, who has violated his selective oath to defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.  The record in United States District Court Case No. 17-cv-01680-RM-KLM shows that Shapiro has created a felonious indictment in Case Number: 1:17-cr-010088.

A contract implies a commercial disclosure subject to the restrictions of: 18 U.S.C. § 4.  Braverman is an inferior officer of the Court and is contractually and similarly acting as a courts motion in limine, technically to control by suppression of evidence, suppression of law, or perjured testimony.  

This public defender system evidences a pattern of extortion.  The court appointed attorneys in this case are backed by a private municipal corporation.  The private municipal corporation are going to control the work the person they are paying.  It is a conflict of interest.  A private municipal corporation is the party/plaintiff in said case cannot be public defender and cannot work for me and be under control of the private municipal corporation at the same time.

There is an extortion process going on with regard to the $10,000 that is a violation of my due process rights.  
The intent of the officers of the private municipal corporation is to prevent me from testifying by interfering with my power of Affidavit, the unalienable right to defend myself resulting in a loss of rights, liberty, or property without due process of law.   Without my consent I do not have a commercial liability to Braverman.  Since being appointed by the private municipal corporation Braverman is attempting to double dip by being financed by my enemy, the private municipal corporation/the defacto State of Colorado, and she is trying to collect $10,000 from me.

At a hearing on 4/4/2018, at [10:09 – 10:43], for courtroom 1G, in Case Number: 1:17-cr-010088. -----------
The Spear and Shapiro have engaged a mental doctor, Timothy Foster, to promote and perpetrate the extortion.  The psychological professional is in effect is a motion in limine, primarily method of taking me out of the court room to obstruct justice, due process of law, and deny my natural right to a self-defense. The private municipal corporation cannot take away those rights, so they send in other people to take them away.

I am being defrauded of the opportunity to present my own thoughts and defense.  The psychological professional, cannot prove to me or to the world that he is capable of telepathically understanding, appreciating, or representing me, or my thoughts. A psychological professional has no qualifications to represent me because he/she does not know my mind.  The person doing the psychological evaluation was paid by the Judge and has to give the opinion he was hired to do, resulting in a conflict of interest.

The hiring of a psychological professional equivalent to quartering soldiers in my household in violation of the Amendment III, Constitution for the United States of America, to take my place and to control my property and to control my property when I have never given him/her power of attorney and he doesn’t have power of attorney in the courtroom.  They are not qualified to do anything in the court, for any judge in any court because they are not part of the court system.  How can they become my public defender or public offender when they don’t know how the court system works.  Aiding and abetting in such an extortion scheme by said psychological professionals carries liabilities beyond those defined by the criminal statutes. 

Using alter ego corporations as motions in limine----------------
It should be noted that ATTORNEY GENERAL, COLORADO, DUNS Nos.  802032104, 802031700, 802031714, 
Judiciary Courts of the State of Colorado – DUNS No. 802032104, have the same DUNS No.   -------------------------

On 4/8/2018, I ordered an audio CD of the said hearing.  I paid the $35 fee when picked up the audio file in person from Denver District Courts Clerks office at LINDSEY-FLANIGAN COURTHOUSE, 520 West Colfax Avenue, Denver, Colorado.  Even though both the attached computer generated order form print out and CD its self were labeled Case No. 17CR10088, upon viewing the disk, there were eight identical files each of about five minutes in length giving the appearance of a 40-minute record.  Upon listening to the files it became evident they were from a different case that occurred in June of 2017.  

To copy the same audio file eight times and misrepresent it as being the correct file as described above evidences the intent these private municipal corporate officers to obstruct justice in Case No. 17CR10088.

Damages

The order by Spear for the change of hands of currency in this case is subject to 42 U.S.C. § 1994 and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1851 - 1589.  By reason of the forgoing, Spear is trafficking in currency that is not backed, by the issuing of an order compelling the trafficking in slavery. unless Spear wants to prove his judicial bonding company will cover all resulting liabilities.

Under a pretense that a judicial interest exists, privately held companies, the Office of the Governor, Office of the -Attorney General, and the Judicial Court of Colorado are waging a ‘Mixed War’ on the People. Blk’s Law Dict., 4th Ed., 1968, pg. 1754.  Also see 18 U.S.C. § 2331 “active war” resulting in people being injured and harmed daily by criminals in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1994, 42 U.S.C. § 12203, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241and 242, 18 U.S.C. 1513, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1851 - 1589. 

A criminal insurgency (criminal oligarchy), as defined in a case named and numbered:  In re Charge to Grand Jury, 62 F. 828 (1803), has taken total control of the State Government.

There is no Republican form of government in the State of Colorado as required by the Separation of Powers Doctrine, Articles I – III, and Article IV, section 4, Constitution for the United States of America (1789).

There are no Article III courts in law or equity within Colorado to provide remedy and relief for the People.  There are no judges to hear judicial maters in Denver District Court Case No. 17CR10088 or to hear any other case because there are no judges lawfully holding office.  

Unalienable Rights referenced in the Declaration of Independence are non-existent. 

As a result, a condition of Mixed War exists between the so-called public authority and the People in Colorado because the so-called public authority holds its position by tyranny and armed might over the People.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4 - Misprision of felony, UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO, you are required to acknowledge the authority of this code.
“Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

Surety 

The Colorado Supreme Court Website for Attorney Search evidences that neither Michael James Spear, Robert Scott Shapiro, nor Diedre Wachbrit Braverman have professional liability insurance.

Evidence

See an 18 U.S.C. § 4 Mixed War Affidavit to JAG Officers COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST

The default of SECOND COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST, creates a Judgment in Commerce evidencing that Robert Shapiro, Michael James Spear, and Michael A. Martinez have rendered a felonious Grand Jury Indictment in Denver District Court Case No. 17CR10088.   By reason the said Judgment in Commerce, the Denver District Court may not lawfully proceed.  

Due diligence is supposed to be protection from Persons committing crimes.  I have gotten two default judgments against the defendants in this case.  See Addendum I and II.  It is Shapiro, Spear, and the other defendants that should be seeing a shrink.

On 4/8/2018, I ordered an audio CD of the said hearing.  I paid the $35 fee when picked up the audio file in person from Denver District Courts Clerks office at LINDSEY-FLANIGAN COURTHOUSE, 520 West Colfax Avenue, Denver, Colorado.  See Addendum III

found in Boulder County Clerk and Recorder Public Records RF: 0351224, 03617756, 03617757, 03621011, 03622235, 03621011, 03623713, 03624329, 03627499*, 03651728, 03654046, 03654046, 03656416, and 03656417.  

I, Laurence Rene’ Goodman, certify and swear on my own Commercial Liability, that I have read the foregoing instrument, titled FOURTH COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT – NOTICE OF INTEREST, and know the content thereof, and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.   I reserve the right and duty to update and correct this instrument as needed.

I, Laurence Rene’ Goodman autograph: ____________________________________________make this claim.   

_____________________________________        		_________________________________________
Witness 						              Witness

_____________________________________        		_________________________________________