Numerous Courts, including: Coleman County District Court, Case #: CV19+01194.
Certificate of Mailing & Service. 

	I;  Charles Stewart;  here-by certify, that, on this 27th day of February, 2020;  that I have served true and correct copies of the following documents to those persons named here-in below.  
	This service was completed mostly by way of personal hand-delivery, in Coleman City & County, Texas, at the Coleman County Court-house, &/or also by Mailing through the U.S. Post-Office in the City & County of Coleman; all as described more specifically below.  Each envelope was correctly labeled as here-in described, with proper postage fully pre-paid for delivery to each of them who were so served by mailing.
	Service by email was also completed on this, or the following, date; for those of these, & others, for whom we have email-addresses.    
	The served documents are generally recognizable as being named similarly as follows:

	“Sworn Affidavit, Answer, & Counter-Complaint, … Class-Action Habeas-Corpus/Mandamus/Quo-Warranto, State-Ex-Rel … Kidnapping … Racketeering, …”;
	and this "Certificate of Mailing & Service".

	Additionally; for the Texas Supreme Court, as listed below; service of documents included not only the two documents mentioned above, but also ten individual copies of a single-page “Cover Letter & Notice” document.  These ten copies of this document are intended for distribution by Clerk Hawthorne, to each of the Nine Judges of that Court;  along with  the remaining copy being directed for insertion by Clerk Hawthorne in-to that Court’s File, as related to this case, along with the two other single documents previously referenced in-to that same Court File.  

	Here-under; all parties served on this date have been served as follows:
	
Coleman County District Court,					James Edison, Texas 42nd District Court Judge,
Co: Darlene Huddle, Clerk; County Courthouse, 			300 Oak Street, 
100 Liveoak Street, Ste 201;						Abilene, Texas          [79602-1521] 
Coleman City & County, Texas.  [76834] 			
						Coleman County Commissioners Court;
Coleman County Constitutional Court;				Coleman County Courthouse,
County Courthouse, Attn: Judge Billy Bledsoe; 			100 West Live Oak Street, 
100 West Liveoak Street, #105; 					Coleman Texas.  	[76834] 
Coleman, Texas. 	[76834] 				
						Tiffani Nicole Helms;
Lee Hamilton; Presiding Judge, 					Attorney for Texas Municipal Government’s 
104th District Court, in Taylor County; 				‘Department of Family & Protective Services’,
300 Oak Street, Suite 402; Abilene, Texas [79602].			3610 Vine Street, Abilene, Texas.  [79602-6913]				
Chad Davin Mancine, Attorney,				The Department of Family & Protective Services,
Presuming/Usurping to Represent Children,		of the Municipal Government of the State of Texas; 
2441 South 1st Street; Abilene, Texas.  [79605-2030]	2400 Crockett Drive, Ste 100; in Brownwood Texas [76801-5909].

Janet Ratliff;    “Investigator” for 					Coleman County-Wide Justice-Court,
the Department of Family and Protective Services, 			Attn: JoP: Robert Nash;	
of the Municipal Government of the State of Texas; 			100 West Liveoak Street, Suite 103;
2400 Crockett Drive, Ste 100; Brownwood Texas [76801-5909].		Coleman, Texas [76834].

Supreme Court of 							Coleman-City Police-Department;
the Municipal Government of the State of Texas; 				Attn: City Secretary: Karen Langley:
Attn: Clerk Blake Hawthorne,						P.O. Box 592, Coleman, Texas [76834].
PO Box 12248, Austin, Texas [78711].

Joy Thompson; 						Jeromy Watson; 
Coleman Independent School District, 			Coleman Independent School District,
303 West 15th Street, Coleman, Texas [76834]		303 West 15th Street, Coleman, Texas [76834]

	The above wording of these names and address are printed basically the same here-in as how they were printed on the envelopes which were sent.  Some of these parties received hand-delivered copies. 

	Additionally, both the ‘Supreme Court of Law for the United States of America’, & the ‘Brazos Street Community Church Ecclesiastical Court’, have been formally presented with copies of all of these document; mostly thorough their notification of their  existence electronically, along with other documents related to this case, on the web-page which we have set-up for securing constitutionally-recognizable & Public “Justice” in this case, under the web-link configured as here: 
	https://constitutionalgov.us/sub/PoliticalSubdivisions-Local/9-TexasSS/WTxSC/ColemanCounty/Cases/Walkers&Stewart-TxExRel-Vs-TxDFPS&CPS/

	These words are True.

___________________________________________________					
Charles Bruce, Stewart; 
1117 North Neches Street; 
Coleman, Texas [76834]
Charles@ConstitutionalGov.US   /  325-232-0241.

". . . the allegations of the pro se complaint, . . . we hold to less stringent standards 
than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers, . . ." 
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 30 L. Ed. 2nd 652 ; US Supreme Court: 1972.

“Notice to the Principle is Notice to the Agent,
& Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal.”

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure: Part 1: Rule 1: Objective of Rules:
The proper objective of rules of civil procedure is to obtain a just, fair, equitable and impartial adjudication of the rights of litigants under established principles of substantive law.  To the end that this objective maybe attained with as great expedition and dispatch and at the least expense both to the litigants and to the state as maybe practicable, these rules shall be given a liberal construction.

Rule 45: “All pleadings shall be construed so as to do substantial justice.”

Rule 191.3 (c): The signature of an attorney or party on a discovery request, notice, response, or objection constitutes a certification that to the best of the signer's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after a reasonable inquiry, the request, notice, response, or objection: (1) is consistent with … and warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; 
(2) has a good faith factual basis; (3) is not interposed for any improper purpose, 
such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; 
and (4) is not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case, 
… and the importance of the issues at stake in the litigation.

UCC 1-308, Without Prejudice; & Reserving All Rights.