UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN,
Hon., Chief Judge Robert Jonker
Jason James Goodwill, Grievant/Crime Victim/
TH
Petitioner/Claimant 47 Delta County Circuit Court
Case No. 16-FH-9339
and,
Escanaba’s 94th District Court
, Next Friend acting on behalf of
Case No. 16-FY-368
Grievant/Crime Victim/Petitioner/Claimant
PETITION
v.
(Rule 17, 28 USCA)
FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS
STATE OF MICHIGAN
and
COUNTY OF DELTA
MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE
CITY OF SHEBOYGAN
SHEBOYGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
REQUEST FOR
COUNTY OF SHEBOYGAN
IMMEDIATE
CITY OF ESCANABA
CONSIDERATION
94TH DISTRICT COURT
TH
ON
47 DELTA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
NOTICE OF REMOVAL
STEVEN DAVIS, Judge
and for
STEVEN PARKS, Judge
DECLARATORY AND
GLENN PEARSON, Judge
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
JOHN ECONOMOPOLIS, Judge
BY “MOTION TO VACATE
PHIL STROM, Prosecutor
AND/OR SET ASIDE” OF
ED OSWALD, Sheriff
ERRONEOUS STATE COURT
DELTA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL
“CONVICTION” JUDGMENT(S)
FACILITY
Counter-Parties/Respondents,
Jason James Goodwill
c/o
and Karen Phillips
1415 4th Ave. S.
Escanaba, Michigan
49829
906-280-5369

This filing submits the DEMAND FOR A FEDERAL
CRIMINAL GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION OF
THE ALLEGATIONS AND EVIDENCE
CONTAINED HEREIN
1(messages only)
____________________
COMES NOW Jason James Goodwill,
a People of the United States, and, ... Next Friend, being also of the People, petitions the above-entitled
court of record
for a writ of habeas corpus
to inquire into the cause of constructive custody
and restraint of liberty
of said Jason James Goodwill
(hereinafter referenced as “Grievant/Crime Victim/Petitioner/Claimant”),
(who is a People of the Republic of The United States of America
and neither in the capacity of a citizen of the UNITED STATES nor a citizen of the STATE OF MICHIGAN, and
who is not subject to the jurisdiction of the following “fiduciary custodians”:

Bill Schuette, Fiduciary Attorney General for the STATE OF MICHIGAN
G. Mennen Williams Building, 7th Floor
525 W. Ottawa
P.O. Box 30212
Lansing, Michigan 30212
517-373-1110Phil Strom,

Fiduciary Prosecuting Attorney for the
COUNTY OF DELTA
310 Ludington St.
Escanaba, Michigan 49829
906-789-5100
Glenn Pearson,
Chief Fiduciary Judge for the
94TH DISTRICT COURT
310 Ludington St.
Escanaba, Michigan 49829
906-789-5106Steven Parks,
Fiduciary Judge for the
94TH DISTRICT COURT
310 Ludington St.
Escanaba, Michigan
49829
906-789-5106
Attn: John Economopolis, Ed Oswald and Phil Griebel
Fiduciary Judge for the
Fiduciary Sheriff and
47TH CIRCUIT COURT
Undersheriff for Delta County
310 Ludington St.
310 Ludington St.
Escanaba, Michigan 49829 Escanaba, Michigan 49829
906-789-5103
906-789-5100
2
Steven Davis,
Fiduciary Judge for the
47TH CIRCUIT COURT
310 Ludington St.
Escanaba, Michigan 49829
906-789-5103
John Economopolis,
Fiduciary Judge for the
47TH CIRCUIT COURT
310 Ludington St.
Escanaba, Michigan 49829
906-789-5103
Ed Oswald, Fiduciary Proprietor
Delta County Correctional Facility
111 N. Third St.
Escanaba, Michigan 49829
906-789-5100

The above entities, named as “Counter-Parties” in this case, are otherwise
under employ as “officers” of the State, as opposed to their being natural persons
who are not under such employ. As such, these officers are absolutely duty-bound
bound 1 , to observe and to act 2 , in accordance with the necessary aspects of the
Law of Nations. 3

1 These types of absolute duties attach fiduciary obligations, as well as enunciated
rights in America, to positions – not people – of power and authority. “[T]he
contractual obligation to act in good faith is like fiduciary obligation,
which...focuses on parties’ positions after their relationships have been
established.” DeMott, Deborah. Beyond Metaphor: An Analysis of Fiduciary
Obligation. Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1988; 879 (p.893) citing Weinrib, The
Fiduciary Obligation, 25 U. Toronto L.J. 1, 1-3 (1975), (“fiduciary obligation
looks to parties' relative positions following, not preceding, their agreement”) The
DeMott article was located on 7/23/16 at:
http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1284&context=fac
ulty_scholarship
See also, Callahan, Hana. Public Officials as Fiduciaries. Published May 31,
2016 by the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics; as found on 7/23/16 at:
https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/government-ethics/resources/public-
officials-as-fiduciaries/
“The relationship between public officials and the public has been
described by scholars as fiduciary in nature. (See e.g. Rave, 2013; Leib, Ponet &
Serota, 2013; Ponet & Lieb, 2011; Natelson, 2004)....[W]hen we refer to public
officials, we are referring to all public actors, be they elected, appointed or
hired.”
“Government Ethics refer to the unique set of duties that public officials
owe to the public that they serve. These duties arise upon entering the public work
force either as an elected representative, an appointed official, or a member of
government staff....Fiduciary relationships [can] include those of the
attorney/client,
trustee/trust
beneficiary...and...public
official/citizen
relationship[s]...The public delegates governing authority to public officials to
exercise discretion over the public treasury and to create laws that will impact
their lives. The public official, once elected, appointed, or hired, is in a superior
position to that of the individual citizen due to specialized governmental
knowledge and the ability to advise, deliberate, and participate in the
3Counter-parties are those believed and/or known to be incarcerating
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill, against his own will,
at the location owned and/or operated by the Counter-parties known as the “Delta
County Correctional Facility” located at 111 N. Third St. Escanaba, Michigan
49828. Telephone: (906) 789-5100.

LAW OF THIS CASE AS COMMON GROUNDS FOR RELEASE
representative process. And finally, the public trusts that the public official will
act in the public’s best interest.”
“According to U.S. constitutional historian Robert Natelson many
delegates attending the constitutional convention of 1787 advocated for a
fiduciary form of government, including James Madison and Alexander
Hamilton....Natelson notes that the concepts of fiduciary government were also
held by the states charged with ratifying the new convention.”

2 Chitty, Joseph. The Law of Nations or Principles of the Law of Nature Applied to
the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, 6th American Ed. T. & J.W.
Johnson, Law Booksellers. (1844); (p. lvi)
“[P]ursuant to the law of nature itself, there result, in many cases, very different
obligations and rights; since the same general rule, applied to two subjects,
cannot produce exactly the same decisions, when the subjects are different; and a
particular rule which is perfectly just with respect to one subject, is not applicable
to another subject of a quite different nature. There are many cases, therefore, in
which the Law of Nature does not decide between state and state in the same
manner as it would between man and man. We must therefore know how to
accommodate the application of it to different subjects; and it is the art of thus
applying it with a precision founded on right reason, that renders the Law of
Nations a distinct science.” (Citations omitted).

3 Chitty; supra, (pp. lviii – lix): “It follows, that the Necessary law of nations is
immutable.”
“Whence, as this law is immutable, and the obligations that arise from it
necessary and indispensable, nations can neither make any changes in it by
their conventions, dispense with it in their own conduct, nor reciprocally release
each other from the observance of it. This is the principle by which we may
distinguish lawful conventions or treaties, from those that are not lawful, and
innocent and rational customs from those that are unjust and censorable.”
(Bold emphasis.)
4The accompanying Attachment “A” is incorporated by reference as though
fully stated herein.
Additionally incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein is...
“’Memorandum on Rights of We, The People’ to Assemble; to Local
Governance; and to Withdraw ‘Consent’ Through State and Federal
Jury Nullification; Through Grand Jury Presentments; Through
Private Prosecutions; and Through Other Executions of Customary
Laws of Commerce”
as located publicly on the Internet at:
http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david-
schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/083116_
2ndCrimeReport2USAAttnyGeneralLynchonEvents_MagisCrime
/Ex_B_MemorandumofPeoplesRights_Khalilcase.pdf



JURISDICTION
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §
1331, 1361, 2241 and 2243 and the Habeas Corpus Suspension Clause of the U.S.
Constitution. This Court has further remedial authority pursuant to the Declaratory
Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2001, et seq.
Venue properly lies within the Western District of Michigan because a
substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to this action occurred in the
district. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).
No petition for Habeas Corpus has previously been filed in any court to
review Petitioner’s case.
5

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Grievant/ Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant may prosecute a Writ
Of Habeas Corpus to inquire into the cause of the restraint......................7
Notice of Case Removal to the USDC-WDM for Habeas Corpus
For Good Cause.........................................................................................8
Just a smidgeon of the Evidence shows “good cause” for issuing a
set aside of “conviction”, for a declaratory judgment, and for
other injunctive relief in the form of a federal special grand
jury investigation and arrest warrants......................................................20
The actual facts underlying the “Domestic Terrorism” resulted
in the “framing” of crime victim Jason Goodwill for crimes
he never committed..................................................................................23
Formal criminal complaints are delivered herein by attachment of
Sixty-nine (69) official “AO-91” federal forms needing only
the exercise of official duty and authorized signature and
Order for a federal special grand jury investigation................................47
Grievant/Plaintiff/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill herein
declares that he is no longer a national of the “UNITED
STATES (INC.)” and swears his allegiance instead to the
Government of the United States known as
“The United States of America” .............................................................63
Request for relief under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
and demand for remedy by Claims established under the Laws
of Commerce...........................................................................................64
Referenced exhibits are accompanied by the following attachments:
Attachments “A” through “I” which are also posted online at:
http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david-
schied/2017_JasonGoodwillHabeasCorpus/
6

GRIEVANT/PETITIONER/CRIME VICTIM/CLAIMANT MAY PROSECUTE
A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO INQUIRE INTO THE CAUSE OF THE RESTRAINT
1. Application for a writ of habeas corpus shall be in writing signed and verified
by the person for whose relief it is intended or by someone acting in his behalf.
[28 USC Sec. 2242]
2. Every person unlawfully committed, detained, confined or restrained of his
liberty, under any pretense whatsoever, may prosecute a writ of habeas corpus
to inquire into the cause of such imprisonment or restraint.
“In the United States habeas corpus exists in two forms: common
law and statutory. The Constitution for the United States of America
acknowledges the People’s right to the common law of England as it
was in 1789. It does not consist of absolute, fixed and inflexible
rules, but broad and comprehensive principles based on justice,
reason, and common sense...” Miller v. Monsen, 37 N.W. 2d 543,
347, 228 Minn. 400
3. 28 USC 2243 (Issuance of writ; return; hearing; decision) states:
“A court, justice or judge entertaining an application for a writ of
habeas corpus shall forthwith award the writ or issue an order
directing the respondents to show cause why the writ should not be
granted unless it appears from the application that the applicant or
person detained is not entitled thereto. The writ or order to show
cause shall be directed to the person having custody of the person
detained. It shall be returned within three days unless for good cause
additional time, not exceeding twenty days, is allowed.”
4. United States Constitution, Article I, § 9. “The privilege of the writ of habeas
corpus shall not be suspended…”
7NOTICE OF CASE REMOVAL TO THE USDC-WDM
FOR HABEAS CORPUS AND FOR GOOD CAUSE 4
5. Grievant/Crime Victim/Petitioner/Claimant Jason Goodwill herein acts within
his right to invoke Article III § 2 5 of the Constitution for the United States,
whereas the judicial power shall extend to all cases in law arising under the
Constitution, and shall guarantee to every state in this union a Republican form
of government as referenced in Article IV § 4, 6 and shall protect each of them
against invasion of rights. Jurisdiction is therefore being Supreme Law of the
Land under Article VI, Clause 2. 7
6. Grievant/Crime Victim/Petitioner/Claimant Jason Goodwill issues this instant
“Notice of Removal” based upon his constitutional “backward-looking right-to-
redress” claims, which are asserted under the First Amendment Petition Clause
with Exhibits of Evidence that Grievant/Crime Victim/Petitioner/Claimant, as
4
Means for reasons which law and public policy recognize as sufficient warrant
for removal, and such cause is “legal cause” and not merely a cause which the
appointing power in the exercise of discretion may deem sufficient. State ex rel.
Nagle v. Sullivan, 98 Mont. 425, 40 P.2d, 995, 998, 99 A.L.R. 321.
5
The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this
Constitution,...
6
The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of
government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of
the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be
convened) against domestic violence.
7
Article VI. This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be
made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the
authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges
in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any
State to the contrary notwithstanding.
8one of the People, is the crime victim of tyrannical forces constituting
“domestic terrorism.”
7. Petitioner refers to the “Memorandum of Law...” on this topic of “’backward-
looking right-to-redress’ claims under the First Amendment Petition Clause”,
the contents of which is incorporated herein as if written herein verbatim in
evidence of a “pattern and practice” being criminally implemented by usurpers
of public office coercing the population and the policies and practices of
legitimate government; and by which this reference document is publicly
posted, as of the date of this filing, at the following Internet location:
http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david-
schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/033116_PAGsSch
ied&Squires_Joinderof-14-
ClaimantsCrimeVictims/CoverFilingandMemorandumofLaw/Memorandu
mofLawonBLACclaimsonJoinderClaimants_ALL.pdf
(Bold emphasis)
8. The Court producing the “conviction” for which Grievant/Crime
Victim/Petitioner/Claimant has been imprisoned was not a “court of record”, 8
8
A "COURT OF RECORD" is a judicial tribunal having attributes and
exercising functions independently of the person of the magistrate designated
generally to hold it, and proceeding according to the course of common law, its
acts and proceedings being enrolled for a perpetual memorial. Jones v. Jones, 188
Mo. App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass., 171, per
Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689. ....7
Cal Jur 571 California Jurisprudence, Bancroft Whitney (1922), Page 580-581
9proceeded under color of laws 9 and incarcerating Grievant/Crime
Victim/Petitioner/Claimant Goodwill un-lawfully, and without due process in a
court of record, and through means of an indictment by a non-statutory and
impartial Grand Jury; 10
9. Moreover, as the FACTS presented herein will demonstrate,
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill is a federal
whistleblower, a federal RICO case victim, witness and informant, owed federal
protections but denied such protections by state and federal fiduciary agents.
This case stems from his having initially stumbled upon and reporting criminal
corruption within the ranks of the Sheboygan, Wisconsin police department
several years ago, being criminal racketeering and a conspiracy between local
Anglo police officers – which was headed by “officer” John Winter 11 – to
9
[Black's Law 4th edition, 1891] -- The appearance or semblance, without the
substance, of legal right. [State v. Brechler, 185 Wis. 599, 202 N.W. 144, 148].
Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only
because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under "color
of state law." (Atkins v. Lanning, 415 F. Supp. 186, 188)
10
Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in
cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in
time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence
to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal
case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use,
without just compensation.
11
Winter’s treasonous escapades and the deliberate dereliction of those otherwise
in authoritative positions for holding him civilly and criminally liable for his RICO
10remove a Hispanic mayor, Juan Perez, by framing his innocent young son for a
crime he did not commit. In fact, the retaliation against Jason Goodwill, taking
the form of being beaten, falsely imprisoned, and subsequently framed for
numerous crimes by local Sheboygan police and corrupt judges, began
immediately following Mr. Goodwill’s whistle-blowing report and presentation
of evidence to Sheboygan’s former major Juan Perez.
10. Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill was originally
listed as a “DOE”, being one of several “Plaintiffs” on a federal RICO lawsuit
brought in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. That
case number was 12-cv-1093. Subsequently, purportedly after the Wisconsin
Governor Scott Walker or his agent released the confidential names of those
crimes, has long been documented by the media, by Mr. Goodwill, and by the
Wisconsin and United States courts. Such documentation dates at least as far back
to at least 2007 with a blog site recording the development of a racist website
between a local Sheboygan reporter, Jeni Reisinger, and John Winter, as found on
3/16/17 at: http://freedomeden.blogspot.com/2007/11/mayor-juan-perez-and-
sheboygan-press.html ; and subsequently in 2008 with the publication of a photo
of Perez that was digitally altered by Winters, “sparking allegations of racism” and
with Winters “not be[ing] disciplined” as reported on 6/29/08 by the Associated
Press in the LaCross Tribune as found on 3/16/17 at:
http://lacrossetribune.com/news/state-and-regional/wi/sheboygan-officer-won-
t-face-discipline-for-photo/article_18554719-3559-591a-a2c5-
8585fee94d76.html
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill’s story is told in
his own words in a two-part documentary interview spotlighted by investigative
reporter David Schied in his “RICO Busters” series found on YouTube with Part
One and Part Two being respectively found on the Internet, as of the date of this
writing, at the two URL’s of: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQW5k-
0d8UA
and: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gFrJnXm0A8
11“DOE” plaintiffs, a number of those federal plaintiffs died or fled the State of
Wisconsin in fear and Plaintiff “DOE” was changed to reveal Mr. Jason
Goodwill’s actual name. (See Attachment “B”)
11. Attachment “B”, being the cover page for a “Screening Order” from the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, shows a federal
RICO case that originally named “Plaintiff” Jason Goodwill as a “DOE”. This
Screening Order reflects the FACT that, as this federal case had moved
forward, increasing numbers of the “DOE” plaintiffs dropped out, until it was
finally amended, at the request of Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant
Jason Goodwill to be named and with an “in forma pauperis” filing status, with
Mr. Goodwill being named as the sole remaining federal witness in that
“racketeering and corruption” case against Sheboygan city government
officials.
12. Though the Screening Order shows that Jason Goodwill’s case was dismissed
as “frivolous” on 4/19/13, just a year later that very same federal “judge”
Rudolph Randa was cited by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh
Circuit for having (once again) overstepped the bounds of his authority by
ordering an injunction in another case for the return and destruction of
contentious documents after a “Notice of Appeal” had been issued to that lower
District Court on the case, a clear violation of court rules. (See again
12Attachment “B”) This shows another instance and the propensity of that
“judicial usurper” to blatantly violate the federal rules of procedure to hide
evidence of something controversial. Randa has since “retired” from the bench.
13. Since Randa’s dismissal of that RICO case, Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill has been fighting to reinstate the original
charges that he and several others had levied against numerous officials of so-
called “government” of Sheboygan for: a) Operating a “kangaroo court”
(“conspiracy to deprive of rights under color of law”); b) False imprisonment;
c) Tampering with a crime witness; d) Obstruction; and more.
14. The case of Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill is also
froth with further controversy. For instance, the FACTS show that Mr.
Goodwill was “discharged absolutely” from the Wisconsin Department of
Corrections on or about 12/17/2012 with MAXIMUM DISCHARGE and with
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill having “no
housing restrictions or requirements” and being a “FREE MAN WITH NO
TIES TO THE DOC OR DCC” and being merely provided a “bus ticket”
to anywhere within the state and nothing else. (See Attachment “C”
containing: a) the “Discharge Certificate” for Jason J. Goodwill #561596-A;
and, b) Letter dated 10/10/2012 addressed to Jason Goodwill from Tonya Lont
specifying the terms for Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason
13Goodwill’s “Maximum Discharge” release, and clarifying that “it is up to [him]
to find housing, etc.” and that he is “a free man with no ties to DOC or DCC”.)
15. Thus, according to the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling in Wisconsin v.
Dinkins, (2012 WI 24) 2010 WI App.330 Wis, 2d 501, 794 N.W. 2d 236
(reversing judgment to the circuit court for Dodge County), this means that, if
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill was required to
submit his information to the Sex Registry, “the DOC would have to find
housing for him”, implying a fiduciary tie with the DOC, as reflected in WI
DOC Directive 11-04 which states, “Lacking a residence is unacceptable as a
supervision strategy. Every effort must be made...in establishing a residence if
the offender is unable to propose available housing. Wis. Dep’t of Corrections
Admin. Directive #11-04.”
16. Further, in 2013 Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill
was previously extradited from Michigan to Wisconsin based upon the very
same allegation and charge that he “failed to register” with the Sex Offense
Registry. At the 1/31/2014 hearing, in the case of State of Wisconsin v. Jason J.
Goodwill, Case No. 13-CF-360, as shown by transcript of that hearing
(Attachment “D”), the prosecutor for that case, James Haasch, cited Wisconsin
v. Dinkins (2012 WI 24) when recommending dismissal of this case.
1417. As shown in the final pages of the transcript (i.e., see Attachment “D”), at that
time in court Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill had
asked for a “dismissal with prejudice” but that Wisconsin judge declined stating
his belief that future prosecutions in that jurisdiction on a similar charge, as
what underlies the instant case(s) here in Escanaba, Michigan, would be “highly
unlikely.” Yet, two and a half years later in 2016, the 94th District Court and 34th
Circuit Court of Delta County, Michigan has erroneously “convicted”
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill on just such a
similar charge of “failing to register”, without either court having the personal
or subject matter jurisdiction to do so.
18. As a result of the Wisconsin court “finding” at the hearing on 1/31/14, the
Wisconsin Circuit Court Access public database reflects that the charge of
“Sex Registry Violation” was “dismissed on [the] prosecutor’s motion” and
that Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant “Jason J. Goodwill is to be
presumed innocent of the dismissed charges.” (Bold emphasis) See again,
Attachment “D” (pages 1 and 2) for WCCA public database search results.
19. “Attorney Notes” on documents downloaded from the State of Wisconsin
official website (Attachment “E”) pertaining to Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill reflect the following in support of Mr.
15Goodwill’s own videotaped testimony as found in the RICO Busters video
publicly posted on YouTube:
a) The “Defendant” (Jason Goodwill) was accused (by the “state” prosecutor)
of allowing a person under the age of 18 of viewing pornographic photos;
b) The accusation above was pursued despite “no physical evidence”;
c) The (only) “Witness” statements used against Jason Goodwill at trial
“conflicted” (with one another) “and [were] found Perjurious on 3 counts”;
d) The police evidence (used against Jason Goodwill) was “tampered” as
proven by a (forensic) specialist, Steve Odenthal;
e) “Exculpation” (i.e., exculpated evidence withheld) “by the [Wisconsin] D.A.
revealed criminal charges against [the] Hear-Say witness”;
f) The “Witness [against Jason Goodwill] admitted to saying what cops told
her to say in exchange for having charges [against her] buried”;
g) The “Defendant” (Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason
Goodwill) is (i.e., was then and remains still now) a “witness to police
crimes in [the] Sheboygan Webgate Scandal”;
h) The “Defendant” (Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason
Goodwill) “was subjected to [a] Mock Trial”;
i) The “Prosecution fabricated evidence, falsified documents, committed fraud,
too [the] Defendant [Jason Goodwill] hostage, kidnapped [him] across state
16lines, falsely imprisoned [him], and subjected [him] to cruel and unusual
punishment, in violation of due process, the Adam Walsh Act, the United
States Constitution, WI State Con Article I section 4 and rulings of the
Supreme Court, in order to Obstruct and retaliate against a witness/plaintiff
in a R.I.C.O. suite, Goodwill v. City of Sheboygan”;
j) “The defendant has never been duly convicted of a crime”;
k) “The defendant was never subject to the conditions that Sheboygan
attempted to impose”;
l) “The defendant was released without remedy or relief of any type and the
court refused to address the violations of the prosecutor. Under title 18 §
241, 242 and title 42 § 14141 criminal charges and an injunction have been
filed against Sheboygan and its agents.”
20. Given the extensive history taking place alleging criminal racketeering and
corruption in the federal district of the Eastern District of Wisconsin,
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill incorporates by
reference the following additional state and federal court cases, as referenced by
Evidence of their relational existence in Attachment “F”:
a) Case No. 2008-CF-000067; Sheboygan County; “State of Wisconsin v.
Jason J. Goodwill” (closed case);
17b) Case No. 2009-CF-000299; Sheboygan County; “State of Wisconsin v.
Jason J. Goodwill” (closed case);
c) Case No. 2012-IP-000028; Dodge County; “Jason Goodwill v.
[UNNAMED] (Respondent)” (closed case);
d) Case No. 2012-IP-000057; Dodge County; “Jason Goodwill v.
[UNNAMED] (Respondent)” (closed case);
e) Case No. 12-cv-1093; United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin; “Jason
Goodwill v. City of Sheboygan; Officer John Winter; Officer Joel Clark;
Officer Jeff Johnson; Police Chief Kirk; Nicole Johnson; Art Diedrich;
Judge Sutkiewicz; Joseph Dececco; Nathan Haberman; Joel Hermanski;
Gary Langhoff; Mike Litke; and Eric Helmke”; (case dismissed and closed
by federal district fiduciary “judge” Rudolf Randa)
f) Case No. 2013-CF-000360; Sheboygan County; “State of Wisconsin v.
Jason J. Goodwill” (closed case);
g) Case No. 2016-CF-000628; Sheboygan County; “State of Wisconsin v.
Jason J. Goodwill” (“filed only” case);
21. Given that the Michigan courts have determined Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill to be a “repeat” or “habitual” offender,
without substantive evidence of that determination, request is established
herein that for each the above previous cases for which adjudication was
18made and a judgment was rendered, that each of these cases be reopened
and fully investigated for substantive and procedural and criminal
wrongdoings. (Bold emphasis)
22. Evidence shows that, as has the pattern and practice of racketeering and
corruption been the subject of controversy in the City of Sheboygan and the
State of Wisconsin pertaining to Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant
Jason Goodwill blowing the whistle on the underlying conspiracy to oust the
Hispanic mayor of that city, so too has been the pattern and practice of the
city, county, and state (and also federal) officials in criminally using “color
of law” to continue the perpetuation of crimes against Mr. Goodwill as
persistent ploys to keep him “on ice”, to keep his stories about “government
corruption” suppressed through coercion, force and violence against him.
Their aim has clearly been to keep raising the question of doubt about his
lawful integrity rather than to allow the spotlight to shine on the lack of
lawful integrity of those conspiring to commit crimes against him through
“simulated legal proceedings”. (Bold emphasis)
23. Such Evidence of this pattern and practice of RICO crimes by Escanaba and
Delta County usurpers of fiduciary offices of government follows the paper trail
of formal and informal complaints issued by Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill along the way as he sought help in every
19direction at the level of the city, the county, the state, from private nonprofit,
and even at the federal levels from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Wisconsin, from the USDOJ and from the U.S. Attorney General.
These efforts, to date have all been to no avail except to document – as
shown further below – such a “chain” pattern and practice of intentional
dereliction, gross negligence, malfeasance, and other heightened forms
“domestic terrorism” such as seen by kidnapping, false imprisonment, and
other forms of coercion of population and legitimate government policies.
(Bold emphasis)
24. For the above stated reasons, NOTICE therefore is hereby issued to these courts
and all interested parties that Case No. 16-FY-368 in the 94th District Court of
Delta County and its corresponding Case No. in the 47th Circuit Court of Delta
County 16-FH-9339 are removed to the United States District Court for the
Western District of Michigan for Habeas Corpus for cause.
JUST A SMIDGEON OF THE FACTS AND THE EVIDENCE SHOWS
“GOOD CAUSE” FOR ISSUING A SET ASIDE OF “CONVICTION”, FOR A
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, AND FOR OTHER INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
IN THE FORM OF A FEDERAL SPECIAL GRAND JURY
INVESTIGATION AND ARREST WARRANTS
25. Paragraphs 1-24 above are repeated herein and incorporated as if stated in this
numbered paragraph verbatim.
2026. As the “pattern and practice” of government usurpers committing crimes have
been document by Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill
on the rare occasions he found such opportunity and the wherewithal to acquire
writing materials and the intestinal fortitude to fight back on his own against
these ongoing criminal injustices, there are numerous CRIMINAL
COMPLAINTS that are presented herein as Evidence to also be incorporated
herein as authentic accountings of the FACTS, as produced along with other
credible Evidence.
27. The facts contained herein, being compiled and presented on the behalf of
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill by his Next Friend,
summarize with the best of accuracy from the Evidence being presented, a
proper accounting of exactly what has occurred to Mr. Goodwill by way of his
being repeatedly defrauded, betrayed, beaten, falsely imprisoned, framed for
conviction, and repeatedly detained, kidnapped, and falsely imprisoned again
and again for years as a result of “domestic terrorists” usurping and inhabiting
too numerous public offices in both Wisconsin and Michigan, as well as the
federal District Court and “U.S. Department of Justice” that have continually
21covered up these horrible crimes by repeatedly “dismissing” these truthful
Allegations and Evidence as delivered by Mr. Jason Goodwill dying efforts. 12
28. The Evidence being presented in Attachment “G”, consisting of numerous
types of documents compiled in a plethora of referenced pages, were many of
the documents either saved as documentary evidence, or created by Mr.
Goodwill in the form of “Criminal Complaints”. Notably, these documents are
to be considered “ledgers” for his “accounting” of the crimes against him, by
those he has long been accusing as committing these crimes – against the public
at large as well as against him – which ultimately demand proper Remedy.
Thus, these documents predicate and adjoin Mr. Goodwill’s Claims of Damages
in Commerce, for which remedy is herein demanded from each “person”
through the surrender of associated individual and “blanket” performance
bonds, “self-funded” insurance policies, third party “excess errors and
omissions” insurance policies, “domestic terrorism” insurance coverage,
through judicial impeachment proceedings, and through the demand for grand
jury investigations and criminal indictments.
12
The fact is that Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill has
two debilitating diseases, one being Lupus, which have been constantly
exacerbated by each of these criminal instances and terrorist events against him.
The criminals that have been perpetrating these events have long been literally
“killing” him; and thus, because they have been aware of his medical condition
while also depriving him of needed medication for long period, the people named
by his criminal complaints should be brought up on charges of attempted murder
and a conspiracy to attempted murder.
22The Actual Facts Underlying the “Domestic Terrorism” Resulting in
the “Framing” of Crime Victim Jason Goodwill for Crimes
He Never Committed
29. In 2007, Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill was living
in the home of a woman by the name of Jennifer Reisinger, who was having an
affair with a married Sheboygan police officer, John Winter. At that time,
Reisinger, Winter and another police officer by the name of John Clark were
secretly working together to operate a controversial website that was racially
targeting the city’s first Hispanic mayor, Juan Perez. Winter, Clark and others
of the Sheboygan police department were additionally at the time conspiring
together to frame the mayor’s young son of a crime. Mr. Goodwill found out
about these schemes when Reisinger asked him to fix her computer when it was
acting up. He logged and copied the details of these unlawful schemes and took
the Evidence he had collected from Reisinger’s computer to Mayor Perez who
then brought the findings to the police who immediately retaliated against
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill by beating him,
arresting him, and falsely incarcerating him for years while attempting to frame
him for scores of fabricated crimes. In the meantime, Juan Perez left his
position as mayor and left the state to ensure the security of his family.
2330. Evidence that John Winter and Reisinger were having an affair and operating a
website racially targeting the Hispanic Sheboygan mayor is found on pages 1-2
of Attachment “G”, as a belated article in the Sheboygan Press dated 8/11/09.
31. According to the Evidence of page 3 of Attachment “G”, a “package of photos
and documentation of the crimes being reported [by Rev. Jason Goodwill] on
John Winter and Joel Clark” which were “verified [according to Senator Joe
Liebham] for authenticity of the evidence and seriousness of the crimes”, were
subsequently “passed on to the Internal Affairs investigator in Milwaukee and
to the FBI” in 2007 by Senator Joe Liebham. This Evidence should eliminate
any “plausible deniability” to all of these “government” officials to their
culpability in the criminal cover-up of the RICO crimes reported to them
by Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill, making them
all also guilty of a “conspiracy to deprive of rights” (18 U.S.C. § 241) given
other Evidence of follow up crime reports by Mr. Goodwill to these state
and federal agencies in subsequent years. (Bold emphasis)
32. At least one page of the Evidence turned over to the Sheboygan mayor, et al in
January 2008 is found on page 4 of Attachment “G”, which includes a note
that Sheboygan police officer John Clark had “seized” and “destroyed” what
Evidence Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill had
accumulated in his home stemming from 2007. This was Evidence that,
24according to Mr. Goodwill’s handwritten notes, was obtained by Winter and
other Sheboygan police officers during an “illegal search and seizure” of Mr.
Goodwill’s property in a widespread effort of police officers to cover up the
Sheboygan police department’s conspiracy to commit other crimes against
Perez and his family.
33. The Evidence that on 8/10/09 Wisconsin BAR attorneys, being unfaithful to
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill in honoring the
“authenticity of the evidence and seriousness of the crimes”, began mishandling
the confidentiality of at least 23 pages of the “Web-Gate Scandal” cyper-crimes
by the Sheboygan Police Department, is found in page 6 of Attachment “G”.
34. Once the Sheboygan police got wind about the Evidence of cyber-crimes and a
scheme to criminally frame the mayor’s son that had been collected against
them by Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill, a task
force was mobilized to collect and suppress that Evidence at all cost, and by
means of “domestic terrorism”, as spearheaded by John Winter himself, a desk
police officer suddenly leading the invasion of Reisinger’s and Goodwill’s
dwelling and several other homes.
35. The Evidence of that terrorism is found, beyond a reasonable doubt, in two
letters written by “Jeni” Reisinger, one typed, signed and dated as 4/4/08 and
the second being typed and signed as a “Confession” letter dated 3/22/09. Those
25letter pages, referenced herein as pp. 7-10 of Attachment “G”, detail the
following:
a) 4/4/08 Letter – That contrary to one of the many things that the Sheboygan
police had fabricated as charges, being that Reizinger had claimed Mr.
Goodwill had victimized her by “credit card fraud”, she had never filed such
charges against Mr. Goodwill, and had – in fact – been solicited by the
Sheboygan police in criminally establishing such charges instead, and she
refused to do so.
b) 4/4/08 Letter – That talk was about the area that Jason had “stashed”
documents [or something] which were to be shuffled from one location to
another for safekeeping and that Sheboygan Officer Winter and others were
about town threatening people who they thought were associated with Mr.
Goodwill.
c) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That Jennifer Reisinger was writing while
believing that she would be killed by “Officer” Winter and/or his associates
at the Sheboygan Police Department for writing out her confession to Jason
Goodwill.
d) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That she met and began her relationship with
“officer” John Winter in 2004 and was set up financially by Winter who was
otherwise involved with Reisinger as an extramarital affair.
26e) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That she operated the face of an Internet
website by which Winters “leaked” information to her about the activities of
high ranking public officials that were made to look “stupid;” and that
Winter’s partners, Jeff Johnson, Joel Clark and Todd Priebee were
instrumentally involved in leaking information about Mayor Juan Perez. The
plan was to provoke Perez into doing something stupidly under public
scrutiny. Further, Johnson and Priebee had a history and reputation of being
ones operating from the Sheboygan Police Department “altering records and
creating/destroying evidence to manipulate cases for John [Winter] and Joel
[Clark].”
f) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That when Reisinger found herself in over her
head and wanted out, she was threatened and blackmailed by Winter for
years. She eventually resorted to a public lawsuit against Winter. It was
shortly after she filed that lawsuit that she met Jason Goodwill, and began
using him to suit her purposes against Winter. Soon after that, Winter and
Clark began “watching” the residence where Reisinger lived and was
providing Jason Goodwill with housing. According to Reisinger, Winter and
Clark also concocted their plan to make Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill their personal “scapegoat” in reinforcing
27their message to Reisinger about retaliation about going public with the
lawsuit involving the controversial website they all operated together.
g) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That she was aware at the onset of meeting
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill that he had
debilitating and costly health problems, giving rise to his needing business
opportunities and resources [such as the housing arrangement] which
Reisinger provided to him in return for his unknowingly providing her with
a sense of personal safety because of his size in stature.
h) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That having already undergone a previous
lawsuit against his previous landlord, being a “slum lord”, and finding
corruption prevailing in that court case, Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill had take special interest in the
underpinnings of what Reisinger had shared with him from her computer as
Evidence of rampant corruption operating throughout the government of
Sheboygan, and he took the initiative himself to further investigate
Reisinger’s case and the Internet attacks against Mayor Perez.
i) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That despite that “Internal Affairs” of the
Sheboygan government were purportedly looking into Winter’s and his
partners’ criminal escapades, they finally did nothing about these RICO
crimes.
28j) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That despite her friendship with Jason
Goodwill, she was compelled to comply when directed by “these cops” to
“bait” Jason to be a “a friend’s place” only to find Winter and his fellow
thugs waiting for him. Reisinger stated, “They beat the shit out of him. I
couldn’t stand any more and drove off. What was I to do, call the police?”
k) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – For weeks later, all Reisinger had heard about
Jason was Winter telling her that he would “never have to worry about
Jason again.” Also, from the time of the initial beating and onset of what
was to eventually become years of false incarceration, Winter and Clark
engaged in a scorched earth-type of activity, attempting to get past computer
passwords, confiscating all of Jason’s belongings, and destroying anything
they could not use.
l) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That Winter and his fellow thugs had “run out
of town” at least three associates and went forward to “destroy [Jason’s] life,
his business, his reputation” while “framing” Reisinger herself for what they
were doing to him (in terms of some of the initial criminal charges against
Mr. Goodwill). That Winter and his criminal accomplices had “planted” and
“manipulated” evidence against Mr. Goodwill, ensured that he got the worst
public defense attorney that the state’s money could provide for him, and
that they subsequently “buried” Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant
29m) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That at one point Reisinger had refused to
continuing “working with” Winter against Jason Goodwill; and, as a result
she was “beaten for it.” Nevertheless, despite Winter threatening to “charge
[Reisinger] with filing a false police report” if she did refuse to continue
covering for his crimes, that did not happen. She was [only] beaten instead.
n) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That when Mr. Goodwill finally did get out
and pay a visit to Reisinger’s home, Reisinger herself telephone the police to
have him hauled off again because Winter had threatened that if he found
them together again he would kill them both.
o) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That though she sympathizes with Jason
Goodwill, her bigger concern was that Mr. Goodwill intended to openly
testify at civil proceedings then taking place in the City of Sheboygan
pertaining to the acts committed against him by the Sheboygan police and
about Reisinger’s conspiracy with Winter against Perez at the hearings
taking place then with regard to the Internet website and their public racist
attacks against Perez.
30p) 3/22/09 “Confession” Letter – That because she only expected that Winter
and his team of domestic terrorists may next come after her, she was
immediately packing up, leaving, and going into long-term hiding.
36. Reisinger’s assertions regarding the intimidation, harassment, and outright
terrorism being carried out against the friends and associates of
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill is supported by
other victims of the John Winter and his band of Sheboygan “terrorists” acting
under the usurped authority of fiduciary “peace officers”. Thus three additional
letters are presented herein as written by “Dave S.”, Tony Scheinola, and
Borger mentioning the names of others subjected to that domestic terrorism,
which support Reisinger’s “confession” statements that the acts of the
Sheboygan “police” were so threatening that people left the City of Sheboygan
because of that fear. pp. 11-13 of Attachment “G”
a) The letter from “Dave S.”, dated 2/20/08 and addressed to “Jason” affirms
that “Detective Clark and Officer Winter have been making very unpleasant
visits” using an email list obtained from their unlawful seizure and
confiscation of Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason
Goodwill’s computer and other private property. The names of “Mike B.”,
“Terri” (more likely “Terry” being referenced as a male), “Marty”, and
“Jeni” are all mentioned as others besides Dave being threatened in such
31fashion. “Dave’s” letter states that Mike had already left town and Terri was
planning to leave. He also reaffirms Jeni’s “confession” that she was forced
to work with “Winter/Clark/Preibe/Johnston” in a conspiracy against
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill.
b) The letter from Tony Scheinola, dated 2/28/08 and addressed to “Jason”
affirms that “the cops”, mentioning Winter and Clark by name elsewhere in
the letter, had “turned [his] place upside down”, seized property, and
destroyed property while claiming that “[Jason Goodwill] was a “Terrorist!
Rapist! Murderer!” and threatening that if anyone ever spoke with either
Jason or Jennifer again they would “very much regret it”. He ended the letter
stating, “I am sorry but I don’t ever want to see you or Jennifer again.”
c) The letter from Andrew “T.” Borger, dated 3/2/09 and addressed to
Sheboygan police officer Joel Clark, refers to the person the Wisconsin
prosecuting attorney ended up using to “convict” Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill of the so-called “sex crime” for which he is
currently being falsely imprisoned for a “sex registry violation.” Mr.
Borger’s letter reads as follows,
“I, Andrew T. Borger, have meet (sic) and know of many different things that;
(sic) April Seymour has done to get ‘attention’/drugs. She had an account with,
TeenSluts.com, Lil-Mama-Luvs-Cum.com, as well as an account on the website
(coke-on-cock porn pics), AdultFriendFinder.com. On each of these sites she has
pictures that would described as sexually (blow jobs, gang bang) explicit. I have
seen her hit on men telling them she was of age. She has a history of use of
32marijuana (pot). She is know (sic) to myself and all of my friends as a lier (sic)
and will try to get others in trouble, even if it means she pergers (sic) herself.”
37. The significance of Mr. Borger’s statements about the person named as “April
Seymour”, a.k.a. “Lil Mama”, are profoundly important since Seymour was not
only the “star” witness used by the Sheboygan prosecutor to erroneously
“convict” Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill of a “sex
crime”, she was the state’s ONLY witness. Importantly, the Evidence
suppressed by the state should have otherwise discredited her testimony, being
lewd photos and statements that Seymour herself was found to have posted on
the websites referenced by Mr. Borger, as well as other “sex-soliciting”
websites, as presented herein by Evidence included in pp. 14-18 of Attachment
“G”.
38. The Internet web pages captured and presented as pp. 14-18 of Attachment
“G” present the following details about Seymour, as believed to be propagated
directly by her to these public websites:
a) Attachment “G” page 14 – As posted on “badassteens.com” with eight
photos of April Seymour smoking a cigarette and exposing her cleavage
along with several lewd photos of other women that have been digitally
altered for censoring of explicit shots of genitals and sex acts, the text
describing April Seymour on this pages states,
33“I love to drink, smoke, fuck, eat pussy, and ride cock. The more the better. I’m
5’4, 38D-28-32 by-sexual. I have been in several porn films since 2007. I live in
Wisconsin, USA. Come see me at my pornsite. Leave me a message. Maybe I’ll
reply.”
b) Attachment “G” page 15 – This is a page from the webpage of
“adultfriendfinder.com” with a single photo of April Seymoure in a lineup of
other young women, showing Seymour to be advertising herself as a “Sex
Partner” age 24.
c) Attachment “G” page 16 – This is the webpage of “Lil-mama-luvs-
cum.html” with five photos of the state prosecutor’s only witness against
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill, April Seymour.
On this webpage, touted as “The World’s Best Porn Site!”, Seymour posts
her age as being 24. Her “Pornstar Biography” reads as follows:
“Hate my live.(sic) Love to fuck! Bi-sexual. Group sex. Available for price $$$ Getting a
tattoo soon hell yea! Yahoo-babygirl_angel_2012@yahoo.com msn-
priseymour@hotmail.com aim-priseymour@aol.com cumguzzler@teenpornstars.com
d) Attachment “G” page 17 – This is a webpage is titled “Drunken teen orgies”
featuring ten photos of April Seymour, some of which are redacted of
explicit sexual content but nevertheless feature a woman of Seymour’s
description engaged in sex acts with multiple partners. The captioning of the
page reads, “Teen Slut presents – April Seymour and Friends”
e) Attachment “G” page 18 – This is a webpage at “Friendster.com” with five
photos of April Seymour showing her “profile” as being 23 years of age in
34Milwaukee. This time she promotes herself as a “Bi-sexual, ex-porn star,
still looking for a good time with fun friends.”
39. The FACT is that, in the pattern and practice that Seymour had represented
herself publicly to be “over the age of majority”, April Seymour had signed a
modeling contract with Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason
Goodwill, while referencing her “Lil Mama” stage name and representing the
same. (See p. 19 of Attachment “G”.)
40. Additionally supporting the contention that April Seymour’s testimony as
“victim” of any sex crime perpetrated by Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill is prima facie “perjured” and generated by her
participation in the conspiracy of crimes perpetrated against him by the
Sheboygan usurpers of fiduciary “law enforcement” in Wisconsin acting as
“domestic terrorists” is found on pp. 20-28 of Attachment “G”
41. The pages of 20-28 of Attachment “G” were transcript pages of a Sheboygan
court hearing that were salvaged by Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant
Jason Goodwill somehow during his many periods of being physically abducted
and falsely incarceration. These pages begin on page three with a discussion by
Jason Goodwill’s attorney “Mr. Nehls” as addressed to the “judge” and
alongside the prosecutor of that case, “Mr. Haberman”. The conversation was
regarding the incredibility of the prosecutor’s “victim/witness” April Seymour
35pertaining to the numerous conflicting and apparently “perjured” statements
delivered by her against Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason
Goodwill, which include the following significant points of factual contention:
a) Attachment “G” page 20 – In the margin of the header area of this page is a
note, presumed to be written by Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant
Jason Goodwill after obtaining these pages and reflecting upon the content
of the statement, referencing a “second report” by an arrow drawn to the
words of his representative attorney Nehls and stating that the prosecution
had not surrendered the document upon discovery request. The handwritten
note refers to this “second report” as a document containing reference to
“April’s [Seymour] charges of prostitution, drug use, under-aged drinking,
and being a runaway” being “dropped when she agreed [with Sheboygan
police and prosecutors] to testify and the arrest report was replaced.” The
content of Nehl’s paragraphed statement in open basically implicates April’s
mother, Laura Seymour, as having proffered “lying” testimony while “trying
to paint a picture that she’s not a bad kid, or it’s not her fault.”
b) Attachment “G” page 21 – This second of nine pages of court transcripts
shows attorney Nehls continuing by asking the prosecution why they have
not turned over the “second report”, implying that the prosecution is trying
to hide something. Nehls moves on in summarily reviewing the preceding
36events that had taken place in open court, detailing one of multiple instances
in which April Seymour was caught lying under direct testimonial
questioning under oath by stating, despite her signature being on the
modeling contract (see above reference to p. 19 of Attachment “G”) that she
claimed not to ever having known Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill by any other name than “Greg Zumwalt.”
c) Attachment “G” page 22 – As Nehls continues in open court, he points out
to the “kangaroo court” (i.e., the term used by Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill when referring to the judicial usurper
leading the domestic terrorism that led to his being ultimately denied of
constitutional guarantees and railroaded into a “conviction” by that court),
that the modeling contract signed by April Seymour also represents that she
was at least 18 years of age. He then went on to point out conflicting
testimony of Seymour having both said – within a span of 30 minutes on the
witness stand – that Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason
Goodwill did NOT know what high school she attended, and that he had also
said he had taken photos of other students at “North High School” where
April Seymour purportedly also attended.
d) Attachment “G” page 23 – Nehls continues with additional examples of
discrepancies in April Seymour’s open court testimony, pointing out that
37even the judge at a particular point had raised some issue at some point with
one of these prima facie perjured statements and setting forth the question of
whether Seymour was actually that confused or was otherwise simply trying
repeatedly to cover up for her mistakes in remembering what she was
supposed to being testifying as directed to her by the Sheboygan “officers”
and “prosecutors”. Nehl then points out that, according to April’s mother
Laura Seymour, April had a “curfew” of when she was to be home; yet it
was later determined that indeed April was a “runaway” and therefore could
not have actually had any set curfew.
e) Attachment “G” page 24 – As attorney Nehls continues with more examples
of April Seymour’s perjury as a so-called “victim” and “witness” against
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill, he points out
the fact that at first April Seymour claimed not to know what the abbreviated
term “PO” meant, yet she had a proven history of having a “probation
officer”. Underscoring that differentiation, as pointed out by Nehls, is that
April Seymour must NOT have been a minor, purportedly being age 15 at
the time she was purportedly shown “porn” by Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill, because minors are not issued probation
officers but “social workers”; and since probation officers are not assigned
until an offender is technically an adult, Seymour must also have been lying
38about her status as being a “minor” at the time of question of the alleged
crime wielded against Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason
Goodwill.
f)
Attachment “G” page 25 – Picking up from the previous page (p.24)
whereby attorney Nehls asserted that the case is one of “he said, she said”,
Nehls pressed the prosecution as to why – despite that April Seymour had
stated she had always been in the company of at least one friend whenever
she went to Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill’s
home and was presented with pornography by Mr. Goodwill at each visit –
the prosecution had never presented any of those “friends” as “witnesses” to
the truthfulness of Seymour’s claims, implying again that it was because
those statements by Seymour were perjured. Moreover, until the prosecutor
raised an objection (based upon exculpated evidence) that the statements of
one of Seymour’s friends present at one of Seymour’s visits to Mr.
Goodwill’s home, Amanda Lampe, as presented by an “affidavit of Detective
Hammon”, reaffirmed Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason
Goodwill’s claim that he did NOT present porn to anyone but instead
showed legitimate photos typical of models appearing in “fair” and “car
show” pictures.
39g) Attachment “G” page 26 – Attorney Nehls continues, being critical of the
fact that, upon a physical and forensic inspection of the purported computer
that Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill had used to
display pornography to April Seymour, neither the detective nor the forensic
specialist could locate any “links” to any of the five photographs identified
by April Seymour as having been showed to her by Mr. Goodwill. Nehls
added in his statement to the Court, as shown in transcript, “I think that April
would have identified five of the photos had she been blindfolded. She was
doing it to get out of trouble.”
h) Attachment “G” page 27 – Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason
Goodwill’s attorney Nehls pointed out the discrepancy between Seymour’s
statements – about going to police on multiple occasions to reveal
increasingly more about her story because she was initially too frightened to
reveal everything at one meeting – and “Detective Clark’s” own testimony
stating that she had never met with Seymour at all, explaining why he had
not written a report of the occurrence. Attorney Nehls simply deduces that
the ONLY reason why she is delivering this “perjured” testimony is because
she is “a liar”, and because she “got caught as a runaway” she is complying
with “the state’s” conspiracy to unconstitutionally deprive
40Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill of a fair
criminal trial.
i) Attachment “G” page 28 – On the last page of this partial transcript that was
salvaged by Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill,
attorney Nehls concludes that, given the lack of credible testimony from the
“victim”, the fact that the prosecution had presented neither any other
“witness” nor any actual “evidence” to substantiate the allegations of April
Seymour – precisely because “there [wasn’t] any” – the proceedings before
the court are simply “wrong” and amount to “nothing more than a witch
hunt.”
42. Wrapping up what substantially supports all of the above in further discrediting
the personal credibility of April Seymour as the so-called “victim” of
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill, is an email that
was purportedly written and sent by Seymour to Mr. Goodwill (under the
assumed name of “Greg Zumwalt”) and many others, explaining how April
Seymour has a lifetime of growing up as a crime victim, being neglected,
physically abused, and repeatedly raped for years as a child by her own
family members. (See Attachment “G” page 29)
43. As shown by Attachment “G” page 30 as an article clipping written by Eric
Litke of the Sheboygan Press, soon after the story broke the news about the
41“Sheboygan Webgate Scandal”, Sheboygan “officer” John Winter resigned
from the police force. Despite Winter’s admission of having an “extra-marital
affair” with Reisinger, and the implications that the situation involving Winter
implied “the potential [of] criminal wrongdoing”, both the “interim police
chief” Tim Eirich and the “district attorney” Joe Dececco and the “city
attorney” Steve McLean all announced that they had “found no criminal
wrongdoing” by Winter and would therefore “not pursue the matter since
Winter’s resignation means the group no longer has jurisdiction”. These public
statements basically defraud the public as well as constitute a RICO
conspiracy to deprive Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason
Goodwill of his rights to common law civil remedies and crime victim
relief. (Bold emphasis added)
44. Further Evidence that these named “usurpers” of the People of Wisconsin’s
power and authority (Eirich, Dececco and McLean), along with many others of
similar disposition as employed by the “City of Sheboygan”, the “County of
Sheboygan”, and/or the “State of Wisconsin” were involved in the persistent
criminal cover-up of these “domestic terrorists’” crimes against
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill is found in
subsequent pages of Attachment “G” referenced by thirteen (13) pages of
partial “deposition of JOHN WINTER” testimony salvaged by
42Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill over the years he
had been repeatedly victimized by Wisconsin and Michigan “agents of domestic
terrorism.” (See pp. 31-43 of Attachment “G”)
45. The partial transcript found in Attachment “G” prima facie shows that it
comes from the case of “Jennifer B. Reisinger vs. Juan Perez, Stephen G.
McLean, David E. Kirk, Susan Richards, and the City of Sheboygan”. In
summary this case dated 8/1808, and filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Wisconsin as Case No. 2008-cv-00708 (a.k.a. No. 08-c-
0708), was a “grab the money and run” with a “flashlight aimed against anyone
trying to follow her” effort to escape her relationship with Winter under threat
of “spilling the beans” on the entire RICO enterprise of the Sheboygan Police
Department if they should pursue her for any reason. (See footnotes herein for a
more extensive summary.) 13
13
On October 19, 2007, the city attorney for the City of Sheboygan sent Reisinger
a cease-and-desist letter requesting that she remove the link to the police
department from her website, a site she operated as “Sheboygan Spirit” pertaining
to the government and community of Sheboygan, as affiliated with her website
development business of “Brat City Web Design”. The letter sent to her by the City
of Sheboygan said that, “maintenance of this link could be construed as having
been authorized or endorsed by the City and/or its Police Department”, which it
actually was as presented above through Reisinger’s malicious relationship with
“police officer” John Winter and John Clark.
Reisinger initially removed the link but nevertheless received a call from
the Sheboygan Police, telling her they were conducting “an official police
investigation relative to the linking of her Web site to the City of Sheboygan Police
Department.” (This “investigation” actually was associated with the repressed
4346. As shown by the notes appearing again in the header of the page preceding the
actual transcript, which is p. 31 of Attachment “G” captioned “Perjury by
officer John Winter in his March 3, 2009 Deposition as Caught by the Judge”,
Jason outlines – with transcript references to specific page and line numbers for
each item listed on this page – the following locations in the transcript where
discrepancies appear, as indicative of “perjured” testimony by John Winter
during those formal federal Court proceedings. (See graphic inserted below)
crimes against Perez, his family, and against Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill. Reisinger then hired an attorney who advised her
to put the link back up. He attorney sent several letters to the chief of police, to the
mayor, and to the city attorney stating that the city had given no legal basis for its
cease-and-desist order. Then, on November 6, 2007, the city notified Reisinger that
it had decided against taking legal action, and the mayor public apologized for the
incident in an editorial in the local newspaper. Subsequently, on August 20, 2008,
Reisinger filed her lawsuit in federal court in Milwaukee against the City of
Sheboygan, its mayor, police chief, and city clerk, claiming that the defendants
violated her First Amendment rights. According to her Complaint, the city’s initial
demand that she remove the link to the police department and the subsequent
criminal investigation were done in retaliation for her support of revealing Mayor
Juan Perez. As a result of the “defendants’” actions, she claims she “suffered a
significant decrease in income, resulting in an estimated 53% decrease in her
personal annual income, significant emotional distress (i.e., wonder why?) and
concern for her safety.” (Again, wonder why?)
4447. In light of all of the Evidence presented, particularly as found in
Attachment “G” as “reasonable cause to believe that
45Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill is a political
crime victim and victim of domestic terrorism who has been otherwise
“framed” for a crime that he did not commit, Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill herein asserts the need – and indeed
marks this instant request – that the judge in possession of this case find
“reasonable cause” to believe that a “Set Aside” of
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill needs to be
immediately granted along with a “Declaratory Judgment” reasoning the
basis for such granting of a “set aside”, and that other injunctive relief be
granted in the form of notification of the United States Attorney about this
case, with a Federal Special Grand Jury investigation Ordered; with added
reasonable cause for federal “arrest warrants” being immediately issued,
and for other appropriate relief, such as for the “set aside” of the
“conviction” of Richard Deno for the recent charge of his “harboring a
fugitive” by sharing his home with Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill up until the time the Escanaba Police
Department forced entry into that home, tore Mr. Deno’s dwelling up, and
assaulted both Mr. Deno and Mr. Goodwill as they attempted to live in
peace.
46FORMAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS ARE DELIVERED HEREIN BY
ATTACHMENT OF SIXTY-NINE (69) OFFICIAL “AO-91” FEDERAL
FORMS NEEDING ONLY THE JUDGE’S EXERCISE OF OFFICIAL
DUTY AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AND ORDER FOR A FEDERAL
SPECIAL GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION
48. Throughout the years of each successive ordeal that Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill has been forced to endure by these above-
referenced “domestic terrorists”, he has formalized both civil and criminal
complaints at both the state level and the federal level, in both Wisconsin and in
Michigan, all to no avail. In fact, all that he has seen is further retaliation
against him, and a growing formidable network of resistors to his pleas to help,
with each successive level of “redress of grievance” and “meaningful access to
courts” being criminally denied under color of law and by repeated acts of
cowardice, treason, “secondary” aiding and abetting of the “predicate” levels
of RICO violations, and a long stream of “accessories after the fact.”
49. At minimum, the named perpetrators are guilty of the following list of federal
crimes:
a) 18 U.S.C. § 4 – Misprision of Felony
b) 18 U.S.C. § 2382 – Misprision of Treason
c) 18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
d) 18 U.S.C. § 241 – Conspiracy Against Rights
e) 18 U.S.C. § 1341 – Frauds and Swindles
47f) 18 U.S.C. § 1505 – Obstruction of Proceedings Before Departments,
Agencies and Committees
g) 18 U.S.C. § 1512 – Tampering With A Witness, Victim Or An Informant
h) 18 U.S.C. § 1513 – Retaliating Against A Witness, Victim Or An Informant
50. The unfinished listing of the “Named Individual Conspirators of R.I.C.O. and
Treason” created by Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason
Goodwill covering the State of Wisconsin, the City of Sheboygan, the State of
Michigan, the City of Escanaba, and other Michigan and Federal named
criminal perpetrators is found directly below:
4851. As such, Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill herein
submits sixty-nine (69) “AO-91” forms recognized by this United States
District Court as CRIMINAL COMPLAINT(s), one for each of the named
perpetrators. Note that the names appearing in the list of these criminal
perpetrators below is likely to be incomplete and, as such,
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill reserves his right to
amend and/or add to the number of these formalized criminal complaints.
52. These criminal complaints – some having been already “served” and
others being served herein by this Public Notice – being also incomplete
and subject to further additions as time allows and/or as it becomes
49necessary, are against the following individuals listed below in their
“private” capacities, as well as their “official” capacities, for reasons shown
by each of the corresponding CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS (AO-91 federal
forms) completed for each person depicted by name. These Complaints are
being compiled herein and appear together as Attachment “H”.
1) Scott Walker (fiduciary Wisconsin governor usurper) – See undated
Criminal Complaint to FBI as found in Attachment “I”;
2) Jim Doyle (fiduciary Wisconsin governor usurper) – guilty of obstruction,
interfering with a witness, and oath-breaking;
3) Joseph Liebham – (fiduciary Wisconsin senator usurper) – guilty of
obstruction and oath-breaking;
4) J.B. Van Hollen – (fiduciary Wisconsin attorney general usurper) – guilty
of obstruction, dereliction of duty, and oath-breaking;
5) Joseph Ehrman (usurping fiduciary state appellate officer) – See undated
Criminal Complaint to FBI as found in Attachment “I”;
6) Jennifer Gaecke – (usurping fiduciary “officer of the court”) – guilty of
negligence, dereliction of duty, and obstruction;
7) Gregg Gunta – (usurping fiduciary “officer of the court”) – guilty of
negligence, dereliction of duty, and obstruction;
508) Victor Arellano – (usurping fiduciary “officer of the court”) – guilty of
negligence, dereliction of duty, and obstruction;
9) Paul Bucher – (usurping fiduciary “officer of the court”) – guilty of
negligence, dereliction of duty, and obstruction;
10)
Mary Struck – (Elkhart press agent) – guilty of slander, libel and
defamation;
11)
Stephen McLean – (usurping fiduciary “officer of the court”) – guilty
of negligence, dereliction of duty, and obstruction;
12)
Sandy Cornell (fiduciary Wisconsin Department of Corrections agent
usurper) – See undated Criminal Complaint to FBI as found in Attachment
“I”;
13)
Gina Carney – (fiduciary Wisconsin Department of Corrections
agent usurper) – guilty of obstruction, interfering with a witness, falsifying
charges, fabricating evidence, fraud, mail fraud, oath-breaking, and RICO;
14)
Jon Litscher – (fiduciary Wisconsin Department of Corrections agent
usurper) – guilty of obstruction, interfering with a witness, falsifying
charges, fabricating evidence, fraud, mail fraud, oath-breaking, and RICO;
15)
Wisconsin Department of Corrections – See the 5-page “Order to
Void” as found in Attachment “I”;
5116)
City of Sheboygan - See Case No. 12-cv-1093; United States District
Court, E.D. Wisconsin);
17)
Sheboygan Police Department – See undated Criminal Complaint to
FBI as found in Attachment “I”;
18)
County of Sheboygan – See undated Criminal Complaint to FBI as
found in Attachment “I”;
19)
Ashley Nicole Johnson (fiduciary Wisconsin Department of
Corrections agent usurper) – See undated Criminal Complaint to FBI as
found in Attachment “I”;
20)
Art Dietrich (fiduciary Wisconsin Department of Corrections agent
usurper) – See undated Criminal Complaint to FBI as found in Attachment
“I”;
21)
Gary Langhoff (state judicial usurper) – See case No. 12-cv-1093;
United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin;
22)
James Bolgert – (state judicial usurper) – guilty of fostering a
“kangaroo court”, obstruction, fraud, interfering with a witness, perjury, and
oath-breaking;
23)
Angela Sutkiewicz (fiduciary Sheboygan County judicial usurper) –
See case No. 12-cv-1093; United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin;
5224)
Edward Stengle – (fiduciary Sheboygan County judicial usurper) –
guilty of usurping administrative authority in a criminal case; running a
“kangaroo court”, obstruction, fraud, interfering with a witness, perjury,
federal kidnapping, oath-breaking, and RICO;
25)
Charles Guokas (Wisconsin administrative law judicial usurper) –
See undated Criminal Complaint to FBI as found in Attachment “I”;
26)
Juan Perez (former Sheboygan mayoral usurper) – See undated
Criminal Complaint to FBI as found in Attachment “I”;
27)
Karol Salata – (fiduciary jail administrator usurper) – guilty of
obstruction, interfering with a witness, torture, mail tampering, fraud, and
oath-breaking;
28)
Paul Brinkman – (fiduciary usurper of assistant prosecuting attorney)
– guilty of obstruction, interfering with a witness, fraud, collaborating with
traitors, and oath-breaking;
29)
David Kirk (former Sheboygan fiduciary police chief usurper) – See
case No. 12-cv-1093; United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin;
30)
Eric Litke (Sheboygan press agent) – See case No. 12-cv-1093;
United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin; also, guilty of libel and
defamation.
5331)
Mike Litke (fiduciary public functionary usurper) – See case No. 12-
cv-1093; United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin; also, guilty of libel
and defamation.
32)
Jennifer Reisinger – (private co-conspirator in RICO and Treason) –
guilty of obstruction and collaborating with traitors;
33)
April Seymour – (hearsay witness) – guilty of false swearing,
perjury, and collaborating with traitors;
34)
John Winter (former Sheboygan fiduciary peace officer) – See case
No. 12-cv-1093; United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin;
35)
Joel Clark (former Sheboygan fiduciary peace officer usurper) – See
case No. 12-cv-1093; United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin;
36)
Jeffrey Johnson (fiduciary Sheboygan peace officer usurper) – See
case No. 12-cv-1093; United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin;
37)
Todd Priebe (fiduciary county peace officer usurper) – See undated
Criminal Complaint to FBI as found in Attachment “I”;
38)
Julie Lamb (fiduciary Sheboygan peace officer usurper) – See
undated Criminal Complaint to FBI as found in Attachment “I”;
39)
Jeff Veeser (fiduciary Sheboygan peace officer usurper) – See
undated Criminal Complaint to FBI as found in Attachment “I”;
5440)
Robert Horsch – (fiduciary “officer of the court”) – guilty of
negligence, ineffectiveness of counsel, dereliction of duty, and oath-
breaking;
41)
Joseph Voelkner – (fiduciary “officer of the court”) – guilty of
negligence, obstruction, dereliction of duty, and oath-breaking;
42)
Robert Wells – (fiduciary “officer of the court”) – guilty of conflict
of interest, negligence, obstruction, dereliction of duty, and RICO;
43)
Joseph Dececco (fiduciary usurper of prosecuting attorney for
Sheboygan County, Wisconsin) – See case No. 12-cv-1093; United States
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin;
44)
Christopher Stock (fiduciary usurper of prosecuting attorney) –
guilty of obstruction, dereliction of duty, and oath-breaking;
45)
Nathan Haberman (fiduciary usurper of prosecuting attorney for
Calumet County, Wisconsin) – See case No. 12-cv-1093; United States
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin;
46)
Susan Hart – (usurper human resources director) – guilty of
obstruction;
47)
Susan Richards – (usurper Sheboygan city clerk) – guilty of
obstruction and dereliction of duty;
5548)
Vickie Garvey (fiduciary Wisconsin Department of Corrections agent
usurper) – See undated Criminal Complaint to FBI as found in Attachment
“I”;
49)
Sally Tess (fiduciary Wisconsin Department of Corrections agent
usurper) – See undated Criminal Complaint to FBI as found in Attachment
“I”;
50)
Joel Hermanski (usurping fiduciary government agent) – See case
No. 12-cv-1093; United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin;
51)
Eric Helmke (usurping fiduciary government agent) – See case No.
12-cv-1093; United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin;
52)
David Schwarz (usurping fiduciary government agent) – See undated
Criminal Complaint to FBI as found in Attachment “I”;
53)
Gregory Weber (attorney supervisor acting as fiduciary for the
Wisconsin attorney general) – See undated Criminal Complaint to FBI as
found in Attachment “I”;
54)
Rick Snyder (fiduciary Michigan governor) – guilty of obstruction,
interfering with a witness, federal kidnapping, turning over a RICO witness
to a Foreign State and Defendants, and Oath-Breaking;
55)
Bill Schuette (fiduciary attorney general usurper) – See the “Criminal
Complaint” filed with Schuette’s office dated 5/20/16, as well as Schuette’s
56“denial of assistance” letter of response, written by his “agent” Donna
Pendergast, both which are found in Attachment “I”;
56)
Donna Pendargast (fiduciary assistant attorney general usurper) –
See the “Criminal Complaint” filed with Schuette’s office dated 5/20/16, as
well as Schuette’s “denial of assistance” letter of response, written by his
“agent” Donna Pendergast, both which are found in Attachment “I”;
57)
Heidi Washington – (fiduciary Michigan Department of Corrections
agent usurper) – guilty of obstruction, interfering with a witness, falsifying
charges, fabricating evidence, fraud, mail fraud, oath-breaking and RICO;
58)
Steven Parks – (Michigan judicial usurper) – See the 10-page “Notice
of Criminal Complaints” (undated) as found in Attachment “I”;
59)
Darin Hunter (fiduciary usurper of peace officer for the City of
Escanaba) – See the “Criminal Complaint” dated 5/18/17 and the “Tort
Claim Against Public Officers Before the State Claims Commission” dated
6/20/16 as both are found in Attachment “I”;
60)
Jason Thibeault (fiduciary county jail administrator usurper) – See
the “Criminal Complaint” dated 5/18/17 as found in Attachment “I”;
61)
Jessica Pelto (fiduciary usurper of prosecuting attorney for Delta
County) – See the “Tort Claim Against Public Officers Before the State
57Claims Commission” dated 6/20/16, as well as the (undated) “Notice of
Criminal Complaints”, as both are found in Attachment “I”.
62)
Phil Strom (fiduciary usurper of prosecuting attorney for Delta
County) – See the “Tort Claim Against Public Officers Before the State
Claims Commission” dated 6/20/16, and (undated) “Notice of Criminal
Complaints”, as both are found in Attachment “I”.
63)
Robert Richards (fiduciary clerk usurper) – See the “Criminal
Complaint” filed with Richards’ office dated 5/20/16 as found in
Attachment “I”;
64)
Timothy Cain (fiduciary “officer of the court”) – See the “Criminal
Complaint” filed with Cain’s office dated 5/20/16 as found in Attachment
“I”;
65)
James O’Toole – (usurping fiduciary government agent) – See the
“Criminal Complaint” filed with O’Toole’s office dated 5/20/16 as found in
Attachment “I”;
66)
Mark Tall – (Escanaba mayoral usurper) – See the “Criminal
Complaint” filed with Tall’s office dated 5/20/16 as found in Attachment
“I”;
67)
Stephen Davis – (Michigan judicial usurper) – See the “Notice of
Default Judgment” dated 10/10/16 regarding Davis and others named as the
58"clerk of the court" and "court appointed counsel for the defense" cited for
their "Conspiracy to Treason", and the (undated) “Notice of Criminal
Complaints”, as both are found in Attachment “I”;
68)
Mark Luoma – (fiduciary federal judicial usurper) – guilty of
obstruction, interfering with a witness, federal kidnapping, violations of
Oath, turning over a RICO witness to a foreign state and defendants, and
oath-breaking.
69)
Rudolph Randa (fiduciary federal judicial usurper) – See his
connection to case No. 12-cv-1093; United States District Court, E.D.
Wisconsin;
53. The fact is that procedure is imbedded in substantive law, such as that
found in state statutes, 14 which take precedence in the absence of
Congressional legislation to the contrary of those state statutes. (Bold
emphasis)
14
Main, Thomas. The Procedural Foundation of Substantive Law. Washington
University Law Review, Vol. 87 (2009) See also, Erie [Railroad] v. Tompkins,
304 U.S. 64 (1938)] as it called attention to the constitutional restrictions on
federal lawmaking with respect to rules governing decisions in cases brought in
federal court to enforce state – created rights. Congress was given limited
substantive powers and responsibilities under Article I; substantive rights created
in the exercise of those powers can, of course, be enforced in state as well as
federal courts, unless Congress provides for exclusive jurisdiction in one of the
forums.
5954. Moreover, 28 U.S.C. §2072 which states, in relevant part:
“[T]he Supreme Court of the United States shall have the power to
prescribe by general rules . . . the forms of process, writs, pleadings, and
motions, and the practice and procedure in civil actions at law. Said rules
shall neither abridge, enlarge, nor modify the substantive rights of any
litigant.”
(Bold emphasis)
55. Essentially then, federal procedures do not trump state laws, especially
when the state laws command “any judge” how to act when faced with
“reasonable cause” to believe that a crime or crimes have been committed;
and when presented with sworn and notarized “Criminal Complaints” as
has been placed into Evidence (i.e., see Attachments “H” and “I”) giving
“probable cause” for instituting an immediate investigation and issuing
immediate arrest warrants, as shown herein. (Bold emphasis)
56. MCL 18.351 – [Crime Victim's Compensation Board (definitions)] which
defines a "Crime": "(c) 'Crime' means an act that is 1 of the following: (i) A
crime under the laws of this state or the United States that causes an injury
within this state. (ii) An act committed in another state that if committed in this
state would constitute a crime under the laws of this state or the United States,
that causes an injury within this state or that causes an injury to a resident of
this state within a state that does not have a victim compensation program
eligible for funding from the victims of crime act of 1984, chapter XIV of title II
60of the comprehensive crime control act of 1984, Public Law 98-473 98 Stat.
2170."
57. MCR Rule 6.101 (Rules of the Court) holds that. "A complaint is described as a
written accusation that a named or described person has committed a specified
criminal offense. The complaint must include the substance of the accusation
against the accused and the name and statutory citation of the offense.
(B)(Signature and Oath) The complaint must be signed and sworn to before a
judicial officer or court clerk....." 15
58. MCL 761.1 and MCL 750.10 describes an “indictment” as “a formal written
complaint or accusation written under Oath affirming that one or more crimes
have been committed and names the person or persons guilty of the offenses".
59. MCL 767.3 holds that at the least: "The complaint SHALL give probable cause
for any judge of law and of record to suspect that such offense or offenses have
been committed...and that such complaint SHALL warrant the judge to direct
an inquiry into the matters relating to such complaint”. (Bold emphasis added)
60. MCL 764.1(a) holds that, "A magistrate SHALL issue a warrant upon
presentation of a proper complaint alleging the commission of an offense and a
15
This rule also corresponds near exactly with the wording of Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.
.
61finding of reasonable cause to believe that the individual or individuals accused
in the complaint committed the offense.” 16
61. MCL 764.1(b) calls for an "arrest without delay”.
62. Note also that the protection of crime victims from “accused” is constitutionally
guaranteed right under both the Michigan Constitution and the Title 18, § 3771
of the United States Code. 18 U.S.C § 3771 specifically defines “crime victim”
in relevant part as follows:
“ The term “crime victim” means a person directly and proximately
harmed as a result of the commission of a federal offense ...”
63. Therefore, Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill humbly
requests that the judge of this instant United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan – being considered in the class of being “any
judge” adjudicating matters within the scope and the territorial boundaries of
the State of Michigan and its constitution and laws – be compelled to do the
judge’s duty to authoritatively sign the sixty-nine “AO-91” CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT forms, be compelled to institute an immediate investigation of
16
This Michigan law also corresponds with the wording and intent of the Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 4, which states in relevant part: “If the
complaint or one or more affidavits filed with the complaint establish probable
cause to believe that an offense has been committed and that the defendant
committed it, the judge must issue an arrest warrant to an officer authorized to
execute it.”
62the matters of those criminal complaints, be compelled to issue immediate
arrest warrants, and be compelled to Order a federal special grand jury
investigation of these entire matters.
GRIEVANT/PLAINTIFF/CRIME VICTIM/CLAIMANT JASON GOODWILL
HEREIN DECLARES THAT HE IS NO LONGER A NATIONAL OF THE
“UNITED STATES (INC.)” AND SWEARS HIS ALLEGIENCE INSTEAD TO
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES KNOWN AS
“THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”
64. As the Evidence demonstrates, the inhabitants as usurpers of the People’s
power and authority have acted as “foreign entities” and “domestic terrorists”
upon American soil by their treatment toward Grievant/Petitioner/Crime
Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill as an innocent man, as a crime victim, and as a
whistleblower. As such, he hereby submits the following statement, and more,
in the context of Attachment “J” titled, “Allegiance to the Republic, The
United States of America”, in relinquishing all ties to the 14th Amendment
“citizen” in status, being no longer “subject” to the jurisdiction of the UNITED
STATES (Inc.):
“I hereby and herein declare my right to contract or not to contract; and to cast
off the fraudulent illusion and the fictitious corporate veil and controversy
created by the unconstitutional usurpation of power and control of UNITED
STATES and its "agents," which I have proof rule by acts of tyranny and
(domestic) terrorism. I also assert herein that I cannot hold allegiance to two (2)
opposing national Sovereigns upon the same soil, as it is impossible to be
allegiant to both one nation devoted to supporting and defending the Constitution
of The United States of America and one nation intent on destroying The
Constitution's underlying meaning and intent.”
63“Thus, under penalty of perjury and before a Notary Public and Jurat, I accept
and say "yes" to having allegiance to The United States of America and metes and
bounds. By claiming such allegiance, I undertake an affirmative act to dispel the
controversy and fraud being perpetuated by the corporate ‘officials’ operating as
the UNITED STATES; and I herein establish my full faith and credit in the Trust,
created in Common Law, supported, endorsed and enforced by Private Attorneys
Generals and/or the Human Rights provided under the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights.”
REQUEST FOR RELIEF UNDER THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF
HUMAN RIGHTS, AND DEMAND FOR REMEDY BY CLAIMS
ESTABLISHED UNDER THE LAWS OF COMMERCE
This instant filing contains a “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” and
accompanying “Motion to Show Cause”, “Notice of Removal”, “Request for
Immediate Consideration”, “Motion to Vacate and/or Set Aside Erroneous State
Court ‘Conviction’ Judgment(s)”, and a “Request for Declaratory and Injunctive
Relief”.
As such, Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill
requests the following:
1) Granting each and every one of the “petitions” and “motions” and
“requests” submitted above as supported throughout these pages with a
plethora of evidence to bring “probable cause” to believe that
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill is not only
innocent, but a crime victim of domestic terrorism, and is thus owed
immediate remedies;
642) Issue a immediate “Writ of Habeas Corpus” and Order to liberate
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill from his
unlawful captivity;
3) Sign in verification of each of the 68 “AO-91” CRIMINAL
COMPLAINTS to authenticate them as a matter of this federal court case
record;
4) Based upon the overwhelming Evidence submitted ushering in
“probable cause” that crimes have been committed against
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill, issue a
sweeping “Set Aside” of all “convictions”;
5) Issue a Declaratory Order expunging all criminal history placed upon Mr.
Goodwill since 2007;
6) Order the immediate convening of a federal special grand jury
investigation into the FACTS as presented herein by
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill;
7) Issue Arrest Warrants immediate against “the accused” to call them in for
immediate detainment and questioning;
8) Provide all other injunctive relief that this federal court deems necessary
and in the spirit of justice Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant
Jason Goodwill.
65AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
The above statements, as well as all attachments incorporated by reference, are
hereby submitted under penalty of perjurY a~ truthful, accurate, and complete to the
best of my knowledge. If called to testify at trial, I will be able to reaffirm and
clarifY all of the statements contained herein in prosecution of the crimes about
which I am reporting now and have been persistently reporting for this past full
decade.
Date:
j -- d I ,- ~ '1
Acting with "power of attorney" as "Next Friend" and on the behalf of
Grievant/Petitioner/Crime Victim/Claimant Jason Goodwill
Date:
-3-'d\--' fl
All rights are reserved.
66