Partial & Incomplete “Conference Transcript”, 
of a Conference that was held on or about Saturday, 22-July-2017;
& as held by the Community which operates under the name of the:
“Government of the United States, International”;
as presented through their & our web-pages, here: 
http://governmentoftheunitedstatesofamerica.international/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPAmIWlKEQA
http://constitutionalgov.us/SupremeCourtOfLaw/Cases/KeithLivingway/

	The last web-link above is where our community is publicly displaying copies of the audio, video, & text based files which are related to this case.  The video that this partial Transcript is retrieving words from, are also on our community's last linked web-page above; & it is also on the web-link in the center, & which references “Youtube”.
	This document is related to members of our community perceiving that wrongs have been done by a significantly influential member of their community, who is known among us all as “Keith Livingway”.  Here-under; we are attempting here-by to bring judicial due-process accountability here-to; as explained in other documents & recordings which are available thru our last web-link above. 
	This partial Transcript was completed & posted publicly very early Tuesday, 25-July-2017. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Transcript Time-Marks begin each significant section transcribed here-in; as follows:

4:30: Keith Livingway objected to the fact that Charles Stewart is both proceeding as a “Complaining Party”, & also as the “Justice of the Peace” & Judicial-Officer of the forum/court where-in these accusations are being adjudicated. 
	CStewart & associates will need to resolve this apparent “conflict of interest”, in such manners as are harmonious with organic common-law, & in the interests of Justice.  Future discussions among those in attendance on our forum/court will focus on producing such a well-reasoned resolution; & Keith Livingway & his supporters are again invited to attend & participate in these discussions. 

18:40: KLivingway accuses CStewart of “Setting up a Dictatorship”.

19:50: KLivingway says: “there is no complaint”; with reference to the complaint that CStewart has presented before our conference/forum/court. 
	KLivingway here further criticizes the complaint because of a lack of formal/statutory paperwork in the form of an “Affidavit”. 

	Charles-Stewart responds to that point, by saying, that: Keith-Livingway is here referencing what Law recognizes as “Lex Scripta” paper-work; as opposed to the true, original, traditional, & organic “Common-Law”, which was & remains known as “Lex-Non-Scripta”; as both of these phrases are defined, here: http://constitutionalgov.us/Blacks5th.htm 
	As by these definitions, true common-law/due-process is not dependent on paper-work;  but rather such is more concerned with the personal Verbal-Conversations which spontaneously flow in Open & Public Court proceedings, & among people who are sincerely concerned about the prioritized cause of “Justice”.  
	Further; our “Final Judgement” here-in has Not Yet been Achieved;  & we expect to be filling-in some of these ambiguous areas with more fashionable forms of documents & procedure, even tho we do not believe we are technically required to do that.  Those in attendance on our forum/court here are under-taking significant time/energy/stress expenditures, in our collectively sincere & humble efforts at bringing Naturally Conscionable “Justice” & the “Conscience of the Community” of our patriotically concerned Americans to Bear in Response to the numerous Complaints brought against Keith Livingway, in our open & public court proceedings, & as evidenced in our above linked court-records web-page.  We are here-in proceeding Slowly, & with “Judicial Calm”;  so that we do not over-look any of the essential-elements which applicable “Law” requires. Most of us are very serious about scrupulously maintaining these Due-Process Requirements of “Fundamental Fairness”, in all of these judicial proceedings; & this in Order for our eventual “Final Judgement” to have sufficient Legitimacy to be Universally-Recognizable among “Reasonable Men” as being Entitled to “Full Faith & Credit”. 
	http://constitutionalgov.us/Archive/Citations/ReasonableManDoctrine.pdf

	This is "organic law" which is being nurtured here-in; & which, from their objections here, KLivingway & his associates seem to fail to comprehend. / Continuing on:

20:40: KLivingway says that there is no law which requires that people who are “despotic & tyrannical” should “Loose their Electoral Status”.  KLivingway continues on to assert that the forum in which this complaint has been brought is a “Fictional World”, with his implication that this is the reason why our forum/court has “no law” which is capable of holding to an account those people who routinely act as “despots & tyrants”.

21:40: KLivingway critically references “Anna Von Ritz”; & he goes on to say that our court's proceedings “could not remove me if you wanted to”, from their purportedly public “Government of the United States of America”. 

22:30: KLivingway says that he has grounds to prosecute CStewart for multiple “Human Rights Violations”.  KLivingway goes on to accuse every person who has made accusations against KLivingway, as “making accusations which are absolutely false”.

23:00: KLivingway displays in his video the partial “Transcript” from the conference/forum/court session previously dated: 14-July-2017; & he critiques many of the words spoken there-in.

25:40: KLivingway falsely accuses “Wonder Ann” from South-Carolina; as being”Anna Von Ritz”, from Alaska.

26:00: KLivingway falsely accusing CStewart as having approached KLivingway's group to help with CStewart's alleged concerns about “Walmart”. 
	CStewart here-by formally makes oath that this accusation is “False”; & that CStewart has Never considered that “Walmart” was such a significant concern as to motivate CStewart to ask KLivingway's group, or any other group, to assist in addressing any such concerns.  

26:55: KLivingway focuses on “David Schied”; & then joins with one “Bill”, who claims the status of a “Judge” with-in their faction;  & they both continue on to discuss how David was allegedly un-reasonable, “angry”, & various other accusations against David, all as the result of their faction's personal communications with David.

30:00: KLivingway admits, that, “every-one” with-in their faction “hates being told what to do. They hate it.”

30:35: KLivingway Deny's the accusation of “Wonder-Ann”, that KLivingway was not capable of producing any “Evidence” that his faction had legitimately & correctly 'Brought Forward the Articles of Confederation'.

32:20: KLivingway Denies David Schied's accusation that KLivingway “leads with an iron hand” & “treats people like crap”.

32:35: KLivingway begins describing the top-down/authoritarian & complicated process which their faction requires for people to complete, before such people may be considered, in their eyes, as being legitimate & honorable constituents of our larger American national organic/constitutional body-politic.
KLivingway continues on criticizing David.

36:00: KLivingway began responding to accusations from Wonder-Ann, & others; that, the paper-work which the faction/group of KLivingway had filed with “The Hague” was “Incomplete” & “Not Accepted”.  KLivingway responded, in part, by arguing that such filings were merely “Notice”, & that they did Not Need to be “Accepted” in order for such paper-work to have the intended & legitimate effect.  KLivingway accuses Wonder-Ann's words of being a “Complete Lie”.

37:50: KLivingway asks for a man named “Marcus” to describe his listening to the conference recording that we hosted in Friday, 21-July-2017.  Marcus here-in goes on to declare his presumption that “John; from Montana” was presumed by Marcus to be one “Robert Blair”;  & Marcus here accuses John/Robert of being a “Squatter”, as tho some-how “Squatting on Property”, by its-self, is some-how “Un-Lawful”; & also accuses that John/Robert from Montana was being “Violent” towards other people who claimed to be true owners of that real-property. 

42:20: KLivingway declares that our forum/conference/court attendees “have No Authority” to put KLivingway “On Trial”, in order to publicly revoke his claimed legitimate participation in organic American National Self-Governing efforts.
	Marcus goes on to declare, that, before any such process can be legitimate, that, the “Secretary of State” from our faction's jurisdiction, must first formally contact their “Secretary of State”, before any member of their jurisdiction might suffer liability to such court related process. 
	Marcus & Keith go on to conjure images of our people grabbing/arresting/kidnapping Keith Livingway;  & based there-on, they accuse us of engaging in lawless/violent “Human Trafficking”.
	KLivingway here also describes formal “Rules of Common-Law” as requiring a physical “Damage”.  How-ever; they all here seem to fail to grasp that this requirement only applies when the complaining-party is seeking to have a peace-officer move with Force to Arrest the Accused, as with a formal “Criminal Complaint”.  Organic Common-Law Tradition does require “Damages” when such a “Criminal Complaint” is brought.  
	How-ever;  this proceeding is Not concerned with accusations of “Criminal” behaviour, nor is it concerned with “Arrests” of KLivingway, or others.  Rather; those in attendance on this court are concerned about “Responsible Self-Governing”, for our larger Organic American National Body-Politic;  & there-under, with Cleaning-Out who-ever might be proven beyond reasonable-doubt to be Maliciously engaged in Subverting the ability of the more credible & honorable American patriots among us from Forming an Organically Accountable & Common-Law Based American National form of Self-Government.

45:20: KLivingway goes on, again, to further criticize “David Schied”.
	Marcus here Falsely Testifies that “Anna Von Ritz” has been a participant in one of our previous conference-calls, where-in we have been discussing this case involving “Keith Livingway”. 
	Based there-on; KLivingway further Accuses “Anna Von Ritz” of various improprieties.

47:00: KLivingway makes a legitimate point in accusing Charles Stewart of having a “Conflict of Interest”, by being both “Prosecutor” / “Complaining-Party”, & “Presiding Judge”; in this case. 
	CStewart responds in this transcript, that, this defect is “easily cured”, as we move forward towards “Final Judgement”; by Charles merely “Stepping-Down” from Either Position, & there-under allowing some other honorable American to fill either of those Necessary Roles, in Order that this multi-sourced Complaint might be legitimately brought to “Final Judgement”, under the non-criminal portion of the other-wise universally applicable “Rules of the Common-Law”. 

47:30: KLivingway Accuses Every-one involved in our proceeding, of “knowing that” Charles Stewart is “Not Doing Any-thing Right”; with reference to the manner in which CStewart is conducting the judicial due-process resolution of these multi-sourced Complaints against KLivingway. 
	They go further, to emphasize that CStewart is “Crippled”; & there-under, KLivingway infers that the others involved with CStewart in this process, have taken an un-fair advantage of CStewart, & “threw him under the bus”.

50:00: KLivingway again criticized “Rob Blair”, from Montana.  KLivingway here accused Rob of “Coveting” other peoples law-related paper-work.  KLivingway also accused Rob of Falsely Accusing KLivingway of “Stealing” Rob's law-related paper-work.

52:30: KLivingway says: “There is no way in hell that I was going to show up to this thing. That is  called Vigilantism.”

56:20: KLivingway declares that he has legitimate grounds to accuse those participating in this judicial process, of: “about Four-Counts of Human-Rights Violations”.

57:15: KLivingway accuses participants in our process of being “too cowardly to face” the people we are bringing our complaints against.  
	KLivingway does not consider this in the larger-context, that, he was invited & notified to appear & defend, but he freely decided to refuse to so appear & defend against these multiple accusations against him. 

1:04:00: An elderly supporter of their faction suggested that perhaps their faction should approach Charles Stewart, so-as-to convince CStewart to join forces with their faction, & bring accountability, in their minds, to the supposedly bad-people who are bamboozling mis-guided CStewart in-to complicity in these allegedly un-justified accusations against KLivingway.  
	Surprizingly, KLivingway declares that he thinks it possible that CStewart might actually be “Reasonable”, & that the elderly man's suggestion might be a good idea. 

	CStewart here-by responds directly to Mr Livingway, by declaring, that, we need to “get to the bottom” of the numerous Complaints that have been placed Before “Our Court”, & this concerning your significant influence over modern patriotic efforts to restore honorable, de-jure, accountable  government, sir.  I, & every-one in attendance in Our Court, will go to extreme measures in sincere & humble efforts to maintain “Reason” as the standard for the collective decision-making that eventually is sought to flow from our court.
	Further; my phone-number & email-address are publicly available, & repeated here-in; & you are welcome to email or call me at any time, for discussions in pursuit of naturally conscionable “Justice”, in response to these complaints against you, & before this court of justice & law, & over which I temporarily preside.  Please be assured that “I have Not Pre-Judged You”; & I hold no personal animosity towards you, other than perhaps my natural revulsion to the behaviour of which you have been accused, & the seemingly significant volume of “Evidence” in support there-of.  
	Footnote; if your contact info was similarly “publicly available” as is mine & others, I would have attempted to contact you before all of this progressed to this ugly stage of events. 
	Further; my knowledge of organic common-law due-process convinces me that you have lawful authority to “form your own court” & your own “12-person jury”, & that all in your own “venue”; all so-as-to Lawfully Adjudicate the Complaints which have been placed before our court.  In fact; if your community was truly the legitimate de-jure/lawful government of the People of the USA, as your web-page & other works seem to clearly claim; then, you would already be holding these very same sorts of “Open-Court Proceedings”, where-in common Americans could efficiently have these very same sorts of complaints promptly resolved. 
	Please be assured that my frustrations with your seemingly ivory-tower aristocratic mind-set, would find welcome venting, if you might merely welcome my offer, here & now, to place my complete skill-set at your service, in efforts at assisting you in your own efforts at achieving those very same due-process of common-law ends to these complaints against you.
	But, please also know, that, one way or the other, because of your prominent status in our Patriotic Community; you have a Duty to “Appear & Defend”, so that these Complaints against you may be firmly & lawfully “put to rest”.
	With all due respect. 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
	This partial Transcript was composed by: “Charles Stewart”, of Sandy Oregon;  
& I may be communicated with thru the following commonly formatted communications-technologies:  503-676-8048  /  charles@constitutionalgov.us