RandyMack wrote: > I tried sending this to the group before, but I apparently wasn’t signed > up yet. I submit this question to the group. My comments are in blue. > > *From:* RandyMack [mailto:randymack@youhavetreadonme.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 26, 2011 11:35 PM > *To:* 'generalcongress@constitutionalgov.us' > *Subject:* Could you provide explanation or proof? > >> I have told Mr Hunt before that >> his mode of engineering "Common-Law Courts" >> is all "Wrong". > > And there is a law professor that has > applauded Gary on his ideas for this court. You cite a "law professor", whom you refuse to identify, & you seem to expect me to take your word that this supposedly intelligent professor is some-how enchanted by Mr Hunts project, & you seem to imply that i have some-sort of an obligation to either prove that this un-named law-professor is in error, or else i should confess my alleged error in criticizing Mr Hunt. The world is full of "moral-prostitutes", Mr Mack; & while that argument might well apply to the un-named law-professor whom you cite, i am much more certain that it applies very well to both Mr Hunt & yourself. > What makes your “opinion” any more valid than his? "Common-Law"; the very subject under controversy (as if you had any knowledge what-so-ever about this important subject). And since you are making such a big deal out of this, i suppose it is a good idea to set the record straight, as folows: Mr Hunt's proosal did not follow the "Rules of the Common-Law" which require unanimous-verdicts from 12-man jury-trials, mens-rea, actus-reus, & corpus-delecti. Mr Hunt does not care about these critically-important elements of our ancinet & true "Common-Law", becasue he is a judas-goat seeking to serve his cointepro masters. And from your imflamatory & essentially brain-dead choice of words here, you seem to be of the same sort. >> He does not seem care, not one little bit. >> >> This is what Bill Cooper said about Gary Hunt: > > What does this have to do with your discussion about Common Law Courts? "Common-Law Courts" are about separating criminals & judas-goats (similar things) from the more honorable members of the community/society. Mr Hunt is a judas-goat, imho; & Mr Cooper's opinion on this matter merely backs-up my view on this point. >> *"John Doe #4 has been positively identified by the Intelligence >> Service as Gary Hunt. He has never been questioned by any law >> enforcement agency*. *Gary Hunt was also involved with the Waco >> Massacre in 1993. _Gary Hunt is an informant for the Bureau of >> Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms_ (BATF). _Gary Hunt masquerades as >> an American Patriot_. The ethnic and religious background of Gary >> Hunt is not known at this time."* > > Sounds like another small, petty little person > spreading more malicious lies and slander about people. Well; there are certainly an excess of "small, petty little person(s) spreading ... malicious lies & slander about people". I might consider makng myself avaialbe to debate you &/or Mr Hunt in a phone-conference; but otherwise, i have not got the luxury of time/energy to waste rolling around like a pig in the mud with you here. > This is the thing about people like this, > they make claims, provide no proof, > or any other substantiations of their claims. I have never heard of you before. You have not seen the past conversations between Mr Hunt & myself. You seem to know zero about common-law, like your guru Mr Hunt; & i really do not have spare time/energy to waste on fools like the both of you. > They cannot provide anything except the very socialist > method of attempting to slander and defame a persons character. The devil postures as an angel of light. (Biblical verse, somewhere.) Give it a break, you small-minded, dime-a-dozen, moral-prostitute. I am going to skip much of the points you are splattering all over the map here, & i am unsubscribing you from our general-congress email-list. If you choose to send-in any further emails, i will consider allowing them into the forum, & if a string of them actually begin to evidence that you actually have a brain that is some-how actually connected to that humungus ass that you are using in its place, then i might consider re-subscribing you. > Yes, I > said Socialist method, for what else would you call it when known > socialist like Saul Alinsky himself promoted this very idea to defeat > the opposition, when you couldn’t defeat their arguments against you. I > would encourage everyone to read Saul Alinksy’s “Rules for Radicals”. > Since the days of Marx, character assassination has been the main weapon > used by socialists to discredit, defame, and slander those who proved to > capable of devastating the “facts” the socialist used to promote their > agenda. There are evil men among us, & they deserve to be clearly identified & ostracized. It is called "Outlawry" (if you had any common-law studies at all under your belt). You agree with this; because this is precisely how you are trying here to label me. Unfortunately for you, the common-law recognizable evidence is on my side. > So, with that in mind, I have to ask myself, > what is Charles Stewart’s agenda? I have not got time/energy recourses in excess to waste on your small-minded chatter. > What is his reasoning for promoting this idea, when he himself > has no proof of the claims he makes. Mr Hunt started the argument. Mr Hunt claims that he knows full well how to run common-law courts. But Mr Hunt completely retreats from the deeper pre-norman-conquest history from whence true organic israelite common-law sprang. You want data, evidence, grist for your whiney small-cc-engine-driven mill; this is the sort of research that shows how common-law courts are really suppose to be run: http://constitutionalgov.us/Archive/Charles/Fundamentals/FundamentalsConstitutionalGov2.pdf > I feel comfortable saying he has no > proof, because if the proof existed, He Would Have Presented It to PROVE > the claim. Yet, as always, there is only the claim, hoping other small > minded petty people believe it. You have been removed form our general-congress forum. I intend to refrain from responding to any more of your emails; Mr Mack. Mr Cooper seemed to me to infer that he believed, in essence, that Mr Hunt was a "COINTELPRO" subversive. Are you familiar with "COINTELPRO"; Mr Mack? Are you familiar with the "Black Budget", Mr Mack? http://www.projectworldawareness.com/2010/08/cointelpro-101-the-sabotage-of-legitimate-dissent/ Hyperinflation is happening becasue the military/industrial complex is printing money like crazy in their efforts to maintian control of the dissidents with real brains in this movement, Mr Mack. The cointelpro black-budgets have dramaticaly increased, Mr Mack. The agents of evil are blasting mega-bucks out at every sort of smooth-talking belly-slithering judas-goat subversive whom they can find to mis-lead honorable patriots of into the pitt of hell, Mr Mack. And your Mr Hunt has all of the ear-markings of precisely this sort of slimey-critter, Mr Mack. I beleive that Mr Hunt, & now you, are just well-financed sock-puppets designed to bring "damage control" against those of us who are inclined to model the true American Lawful Rebellion/Revolution after the truly organic anglo/american/israelite model of "Common-Law"; (a concept concernkng which i am sure that the brains of both Mr Hunt & yourself are completely incapable of comprehending). And you need to either 1: back off, sit down, & shut up; 2: humbly apologize for your abysmal-stupidity (where-after you might actually be indulged with some real education); or: 3: get the heck out of our general-congress forum, & dont come back. I do not have any more time to waste on the likes of you, Mr Mack. May Yhvh allow you & Mr Hunt the rewards which you justly deserve. Charles Bruce, Stewart. Sandy Oregon. 503-668-5091. > Charles left his phone number….perhaps those who actually care about the > truth should call him and ask him to provide this info. Perhaps if we > start demanding people provide proof of their claims and allegations of > others, we could get rid of those who like to play Divide and Conquer. > Perhaps this should be handled in the CoS Common Law Court….which by the > way, has received applause from a law professor, who seems to have not > forgotten what a Court of Justice is. > Charles…..step forward with your proof, or forever more, your name will > be synonymous with Liar, One Who Bears False Witness, in my book. As for > the video, I am not at all inclined to believe anything on a site by a > man that claims we have been invaded by reptoid aliens, and their > half-reptoid progeny are living amongst us, ruling us. Perhaps listening > to crack pot ideas from people like this is what has obviously muddled > your mind and allowed you to believe wild and outlandish claims Without > Proof! > > *http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=105096* > > *I am inclined to agree with Mr Cooper. > Please view the below video * > *in light of this powerful indictment against Mr Hunt. * > > Remind me to have a discussion with you about the merits of our concept > of innocent until proven guilty in our country. You do remember that one > basic tenet we have, right? > > Charles Bruce, Stewart. > Sandy Oregon. > 503-668-5091. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > GeneralCongress mailing list > GeneralCongress@constitutionalgov.us > http://constitutionalgov.us/mailman/listinfo/generalcongress_constitutionalgov.us